Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles Blog Blogs
  • thepercy's Avatar
    6 Hours Ago
    thepercy replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    The same as if under old law there was a ruck and all opposition ruckers voluntarily left said ruck.
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    6 Hours Ago
    I am in truth not doubting PV's ability as a coach - he;'s coaches at levels I could only dream of after all :-) But to sit there and whinge about...
    316 replies | 11232 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    7 Hours Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I think the most likely scenario is that the opponent's offside line will be a line through the back of that team's tackle gate. Its the idea with...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • L'irlandais's Avatar
    8 Hours Ago
    Well Didds, He is the man who resurrected French Flair, so I suspect he knows a bit about coaching Rugby. Pierre Villepreux (on ESPN): "I...
    316 replies | 11232 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    8 Hours Ago
    *shrug* PV needs to have done his homework on Munster, realised their tactics, and found a way to nullify Munster's tactic. Including getting the...
    316 replies | 11232 view(s)
  • L'irlandais's Avatar
    8 Hours Ago
    Hullo, :frown: My earlier reply was directed at antopodean's misuse of the French expression. Laissez faire. Let (players) do (as they please.)...
    316 replies | 11232 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    8 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I think there are three possibilities: 1. Rearmost part of opponent - most sensible (therefore unlikely) as most visible point of reference 2....
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    8 Hours Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Perhaps answered here... http://www.rugbyrefs.com/showthread.php?20413-More-new-Laws&p=333547&viewfull=1#post333547
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    11 Hours Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Yep - I was admittedly assuming the rpeviously suggested "rearmost point even if that's the opposition". Good point well made though Chris. ...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    12 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    You first need to answer the question: In a mono-ruck where is the off-side line for the team without a player over the ball? Then you can consider...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    13 Hours Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Yep. But that wasn't my question. My question is what happens to the offside line when a previously engaged ruck player (o/s = hind feet)...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Thunderhorse1986's Avatar
    13 Hours Ago
    Thunderhorse1986 replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Common sense (or at least mine) would suggest the offside line is across the field, perpendicular to touch line, drawn from the point of the ruck...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Jolly Roger's Avatar
    14 Hours Ago
    Jolly Roger replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Reply to Rushford's post #24 (I thought that it would appear as a comment to his post rather than at the end of the conversation so apologies for it...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    14 Hours Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    If ... - tackle made, BC and tackler on ground - jackler arrives - sets "ruck". Off side line through his feet and tackled player on ground...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • crossref's Avatar
    15 Hours Ago
    crossref replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    That's a great question , if I stand over a loose ball, does that create a ruck ? Has this Law ever actually been trialled , prior to going global
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Thunderhorse1986's Avatar
    16 Hours Ago
    Thunderhorse1986 replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I assume it means when the player on feet over the ball and a tackler AND / OR tackled player. My guess is their way of trying to eliminate the...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    16 Hours Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    as for passing the problem on... what else is Paule23 supposed to do? Just suck it up and face them and their ill discipline again and again? If...
    24 replies | 937 view(s)
  • Paule23's Avatar
    17 Hours Ago
    Paule23 replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    The refusal included details to the Society game scheduler why I did not want to referee them in future. I consider this a report, what the Society...
    24 replies | 937 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Even more fascinating is how even the figures were split Brumbies v Hurricanes (12-18) total 30 Crusaders v Hurricanes (14-15) total 29...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Ruck Law 16 A ruck commences when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball which is on the ground (tackled player, tackler). At...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    No. He doesn't have to now, and won't have to when the change comes in. This change is solely about creating an offside line when 1 team chooses not...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Does anyone have the answer to this: If the first defending player to the tackle gets his hands on the ball will he have to release it if an opponent...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Fascinating statistic. 4 games played in 3 countries in varying playing conditions. Turnovers in all games only vary between 28 & 31
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    That clip caption omits reference to a tackle, which is in the ruck definition text in the slide: A ruck commences when at least one player is...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • ChuckieB's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    ChuckieB replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Well I'd be so bold as to suggest what Nathan Hughes did against Ireland (crept forward while still "touching" the ball, to then pick and go) would...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I had a chat to a local referee who had seen the changes ahead of time and he had asked the same question. The answer he got was a bit vague, but...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • ChuckieB's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    ChuckieB replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    A still I have cropped from the powerpoint. The text book application of the offside line being set. Ruck formed, referee sets the Offside line...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Think of a pause as being in interruption of motion rather than a period of time. So if a support player comes to the tackle and , without...
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    and so the next question is - how long is a pause...? didds
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    1 Day Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I took out the videos in that PowerPoint (>200MB!) and it is here at only 240kB - should be ok for dial-up!
    97 replies | 2457 view(s)
More Activity