Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles Blog Blogs
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    1 Hour Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I took out the videos in that PowerPoint (>200MB!) and it is here at only 240kB - should be ok for dial-up!
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    1 Hour Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Only in my head! I'd like to see a WR document that answers these questions in a format that places them in the context of the current 2017 Laws. ...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I did - just want to know if that is the law :-)
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    See my post #66.
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    yeah would seem sensible for this law trial. Now, the other issue is, having paused there, can the player in the mono-ruck pick-up the ball? Or is...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Great question! If the answer is "yes" (a mono-ruck is instantly formed) then we've essentially created off-side lines at a tackle and trailing...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • winchesterref's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    winchesterref replied to a thread [CLUB RUGBY] Stormers v Chiefs in Professional Rugby Forum
    I was particularly interested in the penalty he gave similar to JG at the end of Test 2. This one though was foul play after the ball was in touch!
    2 replies | 91 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Back to the tackle...:-) a player arrives legally and on feet and immediately (in time, as fast as they can) goes to pick-up the ball. In the...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    2 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    What is the offside line for the side that hasn't a player in the mono-ruck? That side has no 'hind foot' to set the line. Is it the hindmost...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    3 Hours Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Yes, because a ruck formed and therefore offside lines formed. Think of it this way. There's a traditional ruck with 3 or 4 players from each...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    3 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    If a member of the non-throwing side calls where the ball is going (such as "1", "long" etc) and calls the projected play ("top", "maul" etc) I don't...
    22 replies | 750 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    3 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Thanx, VM75 for raising this point. There is a bit of a contradiction here. On one hand we should treat the mono-ruck as a ruck with the ruck...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    4 Hours Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I don't think - but don't know - that is what is intended. If it was intended it seems likely to introduce inconsistency and uncertainty without...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    12 Hours Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [CLUB RUGBY] Stormers v Chiefs in Professional Rugby Forum
    I thought Jaco was very good. I didn't see anything which I thought was obviously wrong. Also thought his scrum management was excellent, and he...
    2 replies | 91 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    13 Hours Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Why not? If defenders commit zero players to the ruck, then they only have themselves to blame.
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    13 Hours Ago
    You're talking about times long past. These days, players are physically stronger and fitter than they were back in the "good" old days. What you are...
    312 replies | 10830 view(s)
  • Treadmore's Avatar
    14 Hours Ago
    Treadmore replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    You might be right but I really hope this is not the case. Was it worded the same for the Mitre10(?)? And is that how it was interpreted?
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    15 Hours Ago
    Dickie E replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I'm confident that this will be OK. My reading of 'immediate' is that it can't happen after an opponent arrives. If the opponent never arrives, he...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Dickie E's Avatar
    16 Hours Ago
    Dynamic, in this context, is different to movement. It means this transitionary phase might just as easily turn into a tackle as a maul.
    312 replies | 10830 view(s)
  • Pegleg's Avatar
    17 Hours Ago
    Pegleg replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I have a PDF from the WRU, PM me and I'll email it to you.
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • Martin Doughty's Avatar
    17 Hours Ago
    Martin Doughty replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Questions on scrum put ins. If the referee is no longer giving any signal for the put in, then what happens in the following situations: ...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • VM75's Avatar
    18 Hours Ago
    VM75 replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    Report them, & let the discipline committee re-educate them. Whilst wholly emphasising with your volunteer status all your refusal does is give...
    22 replies | 750 view(s)
  • VM75's Avatar
    18 Hours Ago
    :clap: I was. But seriously if defenders are unable to be considered 'Maul Creators' merely by virtue of it continuing to move, then it...
    312 replies | 10830 view(s)
  • Ian_Cook's Avatar
    18 Hours Ago
    Ian_Cook replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    I saw it dealt with harshly while watching club rugby at Jubilee Park yesterday. About 5 minutes in, and its the first lineout. A green player in the...
    22 replies | 750 view(s)
  • VM75's Avatar
    18 Hours Ago
    VM75 replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    Ruck - TrialLaw 16 A ruck commences when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball which is on the ground (tackled player, tackler). ...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • ChrisR's Avatar
    18 Hours Ago
    ChrisR replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    I went to WR to to get the changes from the horse's mouth, so to speak, only to find them available only as a PowerPoint presentation, not as a PDF....
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • VM75's Avatar
    19 Hours Ago
    VM75 replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    +1 It's in the best interests of the game IMO to allow the first player who gets his hands on the ball the opportunity to try & take possession,...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • VM75's Avatar
    19 Hours Ago
    VM75 replied to a thread [Law] More new Laws? in Law Changes
    All nicely worded, but the game has gradually lessened the likelihood of possession stealing and now making the tackler be gate entry compliant means...
    74 replies | 1625 view(s)
  • didds's Avatar
    21 Hours Ago
    didds replied to a thread [Line out] shouty lineouts in Question Forum
    ingenious? Its decades old! didds
    22 replies | 750 view(s)
  • winchesterref's Avatar
    23 Hours Ago
    winchesterref started a thread [CLUB RUGBY] Stormers v Chiefs in Professional Rugby Forum
    Anyone watching? Thoughts on the first half officiating?
    2 replies | 91 view(s)
More Activity