• Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011

    The IRB has issued an amended memorandum regarding high tackles, it is reproduced here for the benefit of all referees.

    DATE: 4 August 2011


    __________________________________________________ _________________

    __________________________________________________ _________________

    This is a further memorandum in relation to Dangerous Tackles and the illegal taking out of players who are not in possession of the ball.

    Law 10.4(e) in relation to Dangerous Tackles provides as follows:

    A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.

    A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent’s neck or head is dangerous play.

    A stiff-arm tackle is dangerous play. A player makes a stiff-arm tackle when using a stiff-arm to strike an opponent.

    Playing a player without the ball is dangerous play.

    A player must not tackle an opponent whose feet are off the ground.

    High Tackles:

    At an IRB Medical Seminar held in November 2010 at Lensbury the results of studies by the Rugby Football Union and New Zealand Rugby Football Union concluded that most injuries in Rugby in the elite Game are now occurring as a result of high tackles. The participants generally recognised that tackles above the line of the shoulders have the potential to cause serious injury and noted that a
    trend had emerged whereby players responsible for such tackles were not being
    adequately sanctioned.

    Dangerous Grasping:

    A further trend has recently emerged in the Game whereby players not in possession of the ball are being grasped and/or grabbed by an opponent in and
    around the neck and/or head area, principally in an effort to clear out players from the breakdown. While such behaviour does not come under the definition of a tackle, as no ball carrier is involved nevertheless, it is dangerous play under Law 10.4(e) and/or Law 10.4(f) (playing an opponent without the ball).

    The purpose of this revised Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, (see Memorandum of 8 June 2009) this type of dangerous play must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process. As with other types of Illegal and/or Foul Play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle or the illegal and dangerous taking out of players not in possession of the ball, the range of sanctions can extend from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card.

    An illegal high tackle to the head and/or neck area of the opponent (in particular involving a ‘stiff arm’ or swinging arm), bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a yellow card or a red card being seriously considered.

    The grasping and twisting of the neck and/or head area of a player to effect either a tackle or to clear out a player not in possession of the ball should also be regarded as constituting serious Illegal and/or Foul Play and Match Officials and Judicial Personnel have a responsibility to ensure that the appropriate action is taken by them.

    Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e) and Law 10.4(f)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle or the clear out.

    Paddy O’Brien
    Tim Gresson
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011 started by Phil E View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget


    Knock-on deliberate versus accidental

    Thread Starter: CrouchTPEngage

    Watched a game on Saturday where there was some discussion on the knock-ons. One was given a penalty as it was a clear and obvious "slap-down" and ref correctly said "no attempt to catch". Another was adjudged accidental where, around half-way line, the defending winger rushed up to intercept a...

    Last Post By: OB.. 59 Minutes Ago Go to last post

    Dead or Alive!

    Thread Starter: Balones

    Clarification 2-2007 clearly states that the ball is 'dead' at a penalty which causes all sorts of discussions/disagreements about when a player can be returned to play after a suspension or when a substitution can be made because many will quote 3.13(b) and will say that a ball is not dead at a...

    Last Post By: Balones 2 Hours Ago Go to last post

    Scrum half going back 5m

    Thread Starter: chbg

    A new one yesterday in a BUCS match: the non-throwing SH started in the traditional position next to his oppo; as soon as the ball was in, he retreated at high speed back to the offside line 5m behind the rearmost foot. Would you allow that? It is the offside line for "players not in the...

    Last Post By: OB.. 2 Hours Ago Go to last post
    David Martin

    More U11 Kicking madness

    Thread Starter: David Martin

    I've been to 3 festivals in the last 3 weeks and have played 3 different sets of rules all based around the new kicking rules of play. Is there any chance of some help clearing up the rules with yes/no and a some explanations as there appears to be some confusion around the definition of a free...

    Last Post By: AntonyGoodman 5 Hours Ago Go to last post
    Reindeer Flotilla

    Pre-test match referee society meeting

    Thread Starter: Reindeer Flotilla

    The CARFU Referee Society would like to invite any referees visiting Chicago for the All Blacks-Ireland test match (and/or the Eagles-Maori match) to our society meeting. It's going to be held at the Black Rock pub on the city's northwest side (easily accessible by public transportation) on either...

    Last Post By: SimonSmith 15 Hours Ago Go to last post
  • Twitter

  • RugbyRefs.com -