• Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011

    The IRB has issued an amended memorandum regarding high tackles, it is reproduced here for the benefit of all referees.



    DATE: 4 August 2011

    [B]SUBJECT:
    (i) DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES) and
    (ii) DANGEROUS GRASPING OF NECK AND/OR HEAD AREA OF PLAYER NOT IN POSSESSION OF THE BALL

    __________________________________________________ _________________
    NOTE: THIS MEMORANDUM REPLACES THE MEMORANDUM OF
    21 JANUARY 2011 RELATING TO DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES)


    __________________________________________________ _________________

    This is a further memorandum in relation to Dangerous Tackles and the illegal taking out of players who are not in possession of the ball.

    Law 10.4(e) in relation to Dangerous Tackles provides as follows:

    A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.

    A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent’s neck or head is dangerous play.

    A stiff-arm tackle is dangerous play. A player makes a stiff-arm tackle when using a stiff-arm to strike an opponent.

    Playing a player without the ball is dangerous play.

    A player must not tackle an opponent whose feet are off the ground.


    High Tackles:

    At an IRB Medical Seminar held in November 2010 at Lensbury the results of studies by the Rugby Football Union and New Zealand Rugby Football Union concluded that most injuries in Rugby in the elite Game are now occurring as a result of high tackles. The participants generally recognised that tackles above the line of the shoulders have the potential to cause serious injury and noted that a
    trend had emerged whereby players responsible for such tackles were not being
    adequately sanctioned.

    Dangerous Grasping:

    A further trend has recently emerged in the Game whereby players not in possession of the ball are being grasped and/or grabbed by an opponent in and
    around the neck and/or head area, principally in an effort to clear out players from the breakdown. While such behaviour does not come under the definition of a tackle, as no ball carrier is involved nevertheless, it is dangerous play under Law 10.4(e) and/or Law 10.4(f) (playing an opponent without the ball).

    The purpose of this revised Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, (see Memorandum of 8 June 2009) this type of dangerous play must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process. As with other types of Illegal and/or Foul Play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle or the illegal and dangerous taking out of players not in possession of the ball, the range of sanctions can extend from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card.

    An illegal high tackle to the head and/or neck area of the opponent (in particular involving a ‘stiff arm’ or swinging arm), bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a yellow card or a red card being seriously considered.

    The grasping and twisting of the neck and/or head area of a player to effect either a tackle or to clear out a player not in possession of the ball should also be regarded as constituting serious Illegal and/or Foul Play and Match Officials and Judicial Personnel have a responsibility to ensure that the appropriate action is taken by them.

    Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e) and Law 10.4(f)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle or the clear out.

    Paddy O’Brien
    Tim Gresson
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011 started by Phil E View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget

    didds

    Picking up the ball....

    Thread Starter: didds

    I've just been asked a couple of queries and I thought it best to throw them open to you guys... didds

    Last Post By: Dickie E 3 Hours Ago Go to last post
    ChrisR

    Front row collapse

    Thread Starter: ChrisR

    Watching this: Full replay - North Harbour v Counties-Manukau https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl2UW87X1wI At 15:20 on the YouTube clock. Scrum to White, ball goes in but front row goes down. Peep! PK to White. My thoughts:

    Last Post By: Chris_j 6 Hours Ago Go to last post
    DocY

    'Neutral' TMOs in the Pro12

    Thread Starter: DocY

    Just saw this link and thought others might be interested. http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/guinness-pro12-introduce-neutral-television-11789218 Personally, I'm pretty disappointed (and not just in the tone of the article). I think it sends out completely the wrong...

    Last Post By: Pegleg 9 Hours Ago Go to last post
    Lee Lifeson-Peart

    Where are you this weekend? 2016/17

    Thread Starter: Lee Lifeson-Peart

    Right, I'll start it off. This weekend I have a pre-season friendly Goole (L9) v Pontefract (L8). I only did one 7s tournament over the summer however I have lost over 1 stone since April and am running 2-3 times a week so should be a bit quicker this year. Passed the YRS fitness test for my...

    Last Post By: winchesterref 10 Hours Ago Go to last post
    rugbyslave

    Knees on the ground !!!

    Thread Starter: rugbyslave

    I am now slightly confused, when a maul was formed no matter if the ball carrier went to ground the other players had no obligation to release the ball or the ball carrier, so if a referee calls maul how can he then ask for the other players to release the ball carrier. This tendency has started...

    Last Post By: thepercy 11 Hours Ago Go to last post
  • Twitter

  • RugbyRefs.com -