• Twitter

  • Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011

    The IRB has issued an amended memorandum regarding high tackles, it is reproduced here for the benefit of all referees.



    DATE: 4 August 2011

    [B]SUBJECT:
    (i) DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES) and
    (ii) DANGEROUS GRASPING OF NECK AND/OR HEAD AREA OF PLAYER NOT IN POSSESSION OF THE BALL

    __________________________________________________ _________________
    NOTE: THIS MEMORANDUM REPLACES THE MEMORANDUM OF
    21 JANUARY 2011 RELATING TO DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES)


    __________________________________________________ _________________

    This is a further memorandum in relation to Dangerous Tackles and the illegal taking out of players who are not in possession of the ball.

    Law 10.4(e) in relation to Dangerous Tackles provides as follows:

    A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.

    A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent’s neck or head is dangerous play.

    A stiff-arm tackle is dangerous play. A player makes a stiff-arm tackle when using a stiff-arm to strike an opponent.

    Playing a player without the ball is dangerous play.

    A player must not tackle an opponent whose feet are off the ground.


    High Tackles:

    At an IRB Medical Seminar held in November 2010 at Lensbury the results of studies by the Rugby Football Union and New Zealand Rugby Football Union concluded that most injuries in Rugby in the elite Game are now occurring as a result of high tackles. The participants generally recognised that tackles above the line of the shoulders have the potential to cause serious injury and noted that a
    trend had emerged whereby players responsible for such tackles were not being
    adequately sanctioned.

    Dangerous Grasping:

    A further trend has recently emerged in the Game whereby players not in possession of the ball are being grasped and/or grabbed by an opponent in and
    around the neck and/or head area, principally in an effort to clear out players from the breakdown. While such behaviour does not come under the definition of a tackle, as no ball carrier is involved nevertheless, it is dangerous play under Law 10.4(e) and/or Law 10.4(f) (playing an opponent without the ball).

    The purpose of this revised Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, (see Memorandum of 8 June 2009) this type of dangerous play must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process. As with other types of Illegal and/or Foul Play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle or the illegal and dangerous taking out of players not in possession of the ball, the range of sanctions can extend from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card.

    An illegal high tackle to the head and/or neck area of the opponent (in particular involving a ‘stiff arm’ or swinging arm), bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a yellow card or a red card being seriously considered.

    The grasping and twisting of the neck and/or head area of a player to effect either a tackle or to clear out a player not in possession of the ball should also be regarded as constituting serious Illegal and/or Foul Play and Match Officials and Judicial Personnel have a responsibility to ensure that the appropriate action is taken by them.

    Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e) and Law 10.4(f)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle or the clear out.

    Paddy O’Brien
    Tim Gresson
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011 started by Phil E View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget

    Ralfs

    post-protector thickness

    Thread Starter: Ralfs

    I have a question regarding the thickness of post-protectors in connection with safety. We had a youth tournament last weekend. On our second pitch a player hurt his head running into a post (no other players involved). The protectors are not the normal thick square ones you usually see on the...

    Last Post By: damo 17 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    oliver

    Removal of post-protector mid-game

    Thread Starter: oliver

    Here's one I've never seen before. In the Bay of Plenty v Counties Manukau game this weekend, BOP are attacking the CM line. One of the CM players removes the post-protector (let's assume he just wanted to defend the line more easily and it wasn't a more cynical removal). The referee immediately...

    Last Post By: Pinky 33 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    WombleRef

    Penalty Try awarded right at the end of play.

    Thread Starter: WombleRef

    Purple v Black. Black with 15 seconds to go are 32-22 up. Purple 10 makes a break and goes over the line, only for Black 7 to smash into him dangerously high and knock the ball on, What would you do? I awarded the penalty try to make it 32-29 to Black and then called full time as my watch...

    Last Post By: didds 1 Hour Ago Go to last post
    Andrew1974

    What would you do.... not seen this before (or since)

    Thread Starter: Andrew1974

    I have a game coming up in a couple of weeks at a club I have not refereed at for a couple of years. This has reminded me of an incident form last time I was there, what would you do... Away team, score a try, I signal as such, then walk in at straight line away from the goal line, noting the...

    Last Post By: Andrew1974 12 Hours Ago Go to last post
    breako

    What was this decision for?

    Thread Starter: breako

    Was watching this earlier, can't understand what the first penalty is for. Ball looks out to me: Youtube clip is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_UkFTSkDQQ It can't be 16.4.e "A player must not fall on or over the ball as it is coming out of a ruck." as ball is clearly out Was the...

    Last Post By: VM75 13 Hours Ago Go to last post