• Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011

    The IRB has issued an amended memorandum regarding high tackles, it is reproduced here for the benefit of all referees.



    DATE: 4 August 2011

    [B]SUBJECT:
    (i) DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES) and
    (ii) DANGEROUS GRASPING OF NECK AND/OR HEAD AREA OF PLAYER NOT IN POSSESSION OF THE BALL

    __________________________________________________ _________________
    NOTE: THIS MEMORANDUM REPLACES THE MEMORANDUM OF
    21 JANUARY 2011 RELATING TO DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES)


    __________________________________________________ _________________

    This is a further memorandum in relation to Dangerous Tackles and the illegal taking out of players who are not in possession of the ball.

    Law 10.4(e) in relation to Dangerous Tackles provides as follows:

    A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.

    A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent’s neck or head is dangerous play.

    A stiff-arm tackle is dangerous play. A player makes a stiff-arm tackle when using a stiff-arm to strike an opponent.

    Playing a player without the ball is dangerous play.

    A player must not tackle an opponent whose feet are off the ground.


    High Tackles:

    At an IRB Medical Seminar held in November 2010 at Lensbury the results of studies by the Rugby Football Union and New Zealand Rugby Football Union concluded that most injuries in Rugby in the elite Game are now occurring as a result of high tackles. The participants generally recognised that tackles above the line of the shoulders have the potential to cause serious injury and noted that a
    trend had emerged whereby players responsible for such tackles were not being
    adequately sanctioned.

    Dangerous Grasping:

    A further trend has recently emerged in the Game whereby players not in possession of the ball are being grasped and/or grabbed by an opponent in and
    around the neck and/or head area, principally in an effort to clear out players from the breakdown. While such behaviour does not come under the definition of a tackle, as no ball carrier is involved nevertheless, it is dangerous play under Law 10.4(e) and/or Law 10.4(f) (playing an opponent without the ball).

    The purpose of this revised Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, (see Memorandum of 8 June 2009) this type of dangerous play must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process. As with other types of Illegal and/or Foul Play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle or the illegal and dangerous taking out of players not in possession of the ball, the range of sanctions can extend from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card.

    An illegal high tackle to the head and/or neck area of the opponent (in particular involving a ‘stiff arm’ or swinging arm), bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a yellow card or a red card being seriously considered.

    The grasping and twisting of the neck and/or head area of a player to effect either a tackle or to clear out a player not in possession of the ball should also be regarded as constituting serious Illegal and/or Foul Play and Match Officials and Judicial Personnel have a responsibility to ensure that the appropriate action is taken by them.

    Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e) and Law 10.4(f)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle or the clear out.

    Paddy O’Brien
    Tim Gresson
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011 started by Phil E View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget

    Paule23

    Increasing lack of respect?

    Thread Starter: Paule23

    I'm wondering if other referees are noticing or experiencing a lack of respect from teams and coaches. I have refereed 3 games this season where either the whole (losing) team and coaches, or the vast majority of them, have refused to shake my hand after a game. I appreciate they may have...

    Last Post By: Dickie E 7 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    didds

    George North - taken in the air

    Thread Starter: didds

    More showing the stupidity of this taken in the air sanction stuff. http://sport.bt.com/video-01363814401986?videoid=5234656867001&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral north land on his side. Nano seconds later his head then wobbles and hits the ground. He is unconcious.

    Last Post By: didds 47 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    TheBFG

    What would you give (without TMO)

    Thread Starter: TheBFG

    I don't think I've seen this one discussed, should be a good one :wink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT0qtuzorEM What would you give?

    Last Post By: didds 49 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    DocY

    "shocking" "tackle"

    Thread Starter: DocY

    Any thoughts about what to give for this? Personally, I thought a YC was right. Spoiler: it's neither shocking, nor a tackle. http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/shocking-tackle-thats-left-rugby-12291253

    Last Post By: Guyseep 10 Hours Ago Go to last post
    crossref

    was that 10m

    Thread Starter: crossref

    Did this kick from Ireland v NZ go 10m? Black kick off, the ball travels 9m where it is caught by a black player with his feet on the ground the far side of the 10m line... So is that a 10m kick or not? Here it is in real time, followed after about a minute by a slow motion replay

    Last Post By: Dickie E 14 Hours Ago Go to last post
  • Twitter

  • RugbyRefs.com -