• Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011

    The IRB has issued an amended memorandum regarding high tackles, it is reproduced here for the benefit of all referees.



    DATE: 4 August 2011

    [B]SUBJECT:
    (i) DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES) and
    (ii) DANGEROUS GRASPING OF NECK AND/OR HEAD AREA OF PLAYER NOT IN POSSESSION OF THE BALL

    __________________________________________________ _________________
    NOTE: THIS MEMORANDUM REPLACES THE MEMORANDUM OF
    21 JANUARY 2011 RELATING TO DANGEROUS TACKLES (HIGH TACKLES)


    __________________________________________________ _________________

    This is a further memorandum in relation to Dangerous Tackles and the illegal taking out of players who are not in possession of the ball.

    Law 10.4(e) in relation to Dangerous Tackles provides as follows:

    A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously.

    A player must not tackle (or try to tackle) an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders. A tackle around the opponent’s neck or head is dangerous play.

    A stiff-arm tackle is dangerous play. A player makes a stiff-arm tackle when using a stiff-arm to strike an opponent.

    Playing a player without the ball is dangerous play.

    A player must not tackle an opponent whose feet are off the ground.


    High Tackles:

    At an IRB Medical Seminar held in November 2010 at Lensbury the results of studies by the Rugby Football Union and New Zealand Rugby Football Union concluded that most injuries in Rugby in the elite Game are now occurring as a result of high tackles. The participants generally recognised that tackles above the line of the shoulders have the potential to cause serious injury and noted that a
    trend had emerged whereby players responsible for such tackles were not being
    adequately sanctioned.

    Dangerous Grasping:

    A further trend has recently emerged in the Game whereby players not in possession of the ball are being grasped and/or grabbed by an opponent in and
    around the neck and/or head area, principally in an effort to clear out players from the breakdown. While such behaviour does not come under the definition of a tackle, as no ball carrier is involved nevertheless, it is dangerous play under Law 10.4(e) and/or Law 10.4(f) (playing an opponent without the ball).

    The purpose of this revised Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, (see Memorandum of 8 June 2009) this type of dangerous play must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process. As with other types of Illegal and/or Foul Play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle or the illegal and dangerous taking out of players not in possession of the ball, the range of sanctions can extend from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card.

    An illegal high tackle to the head and/or neck area of the opponent (in particular involving a ‘stiff arm’ or swinging arm), bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a yellow card or a red card being seriously considered.

    The grasping and twisting of the neck and/or head area of a player to effect either a tackle or to clear out a player not in possession of the ball should also be regarded as constituting serious Illegal and/or Foul Play and Match Officials and Judicial Personnel have a responsibility to ensure that the appropriate action is taken by them.

    Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e) and Law 10.4(f)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle or the clear out.

    Paddy O’Brien
    Tim Gresson
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Memo Dangerous Tackles - August 2011 started by Phil E View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget

    OB..

    Referee marking the lineout

    Thread Starter: OB..

    The PMB thread nearly got side-tracked into this, and I would like to clarify the various techniques. Basically there are three: 1. Make a mark for both non-throwing and throwing teams 2. Mark the line of touch and set a gap 3. Make a mark for the non-throwing side only. (In all cases the...

    Last Post By: Phil E 1 Hour Ago Go to last post
    L'irlandais

    How Brexit may affect your wallet.

    Thread Starter: L'irlandais

    BBC report Well many folks in Ireland (North and South) and Scotland woke up this morning regretting their neighbours decision. In the short term a price increase looks on the cards for many commodities in the UK, but can anybody honestly say what the long-term effect will be? This BBC report...

    Last Post By: Dixie 2 Hours Ago Go to last post
    crossref

    The hooter

    Thread Starter: crossref

    So what is definitive sign for time expiring, the clock? The hooter? Something else? Who exactly blows the hooter.

    Last Post By: crossref 7 Hours Ago Go to last post
    DocY

    Pre match briefings

    Thread Starter: DocY

    I don't know if it's the same for anyone else, but since I've started refereeing I've had very little guidance when it comes to pre match briefings. About all I've ever had is the odd assessor who's listened in and maybe given a few words of feedback and the only time I ever get to hear other...

    Last Post By: OB.. 10 Hours Ago Go to last post
    Huck2Spit

    Tips for keeping a Scorecard

    Thread Starter: Huck2Spit

    This seems very basic and probably upto everyone's preference. I find at the end of a match what I've recorded is too illegible, worn or hastily noted to be a good reference in writing my report. Haven't lost track of any points, yet, but not sure what details to note or short hand could be best....

    Last Post By: SimonSmith 21 Hours Ago Go to last post
  • Twitter

  • RugbyRefs.com -