• Twitter

  • Understanding 'Clear & Obvious'

    As we approach the start of the 2015 Rugby World Cup in England, we are going to look at what the term 'Clear & Obvious' means to a referee, and the greater team of 4 in general.

    During the world cup, the match officials will be under a greater degree of scrutiny than has ever been seen before, the desire to get every decision correct is there, but perfection is something even that even the best teams have not yet achieved.

    Perfection for a team would surely mean that no player drops a ball, every pass goes where intended, every tackle is made, and every kick is successful. However, as supporters we understand that this is near impossible to do over a full 80 minutes. The dynamics of the game, along with the unpredictability of the opposition defence means that mistakes will happen, but it's how you over come them that really defines the team.
    As match officials, there is very little chance to overcome a mistake, even if the rest of the game is flawless, the referee is remembered for that decision. And in some circumstances, getting the decision correct also gets you bad press, as Alain Rolland saw with his red carding of Sam Warburton. This means that not only do match officials need to make the right decision, they need to be seen to be following a process that persuades the majority of people watching that the decision is correct. In short, the job is harder than it has ever been.

    As match officials, the greatest praise they can generally get is that no one is talking about them after the game, and that all attention is on the players, and the game they played. The desire & need for the team of 4 (including the Television Match Official) to get every decision & non decision right is crucial, and this is where 'Clear & Obvious' comes in to play.

    'Clear & Obvious' in its most simple form means that a referee will only penalise a team for an offence that is beyond doubt. This includes a clear knock-on, to a clear offside, or clearly lying over a ball. If the referee is any doubt, then the decision should be to play on. In the case of a try being scored, there is an opportunity for the referee to check with the TMO should they, or their team, believe there may have been an offence in the build to the try. However, this is only if the team of 4 suspect something, if they have not seen any issues there will be no review.

    In a tight game, 'Clear & Obvious' is more important than the above, it becomes a vital prime directive. A penalty in a tight game can mean points, or the removal of a phase of pressure, so the offence to warrant giving a penalty must be 100% clear in the Referee, or Assistant Referee's mind before calling it. This in itself gives a higher probability of the call being correct, especially in the view of multiple camera angles & slow motion replays to the commentators & watching audience.

    Players & Coaches at the elite level of the game are very supportive of this approach. It allows the players to compete fairly, and to determine the outcome of a game on their own abilities. After all, we all (Including referees) watch rugby for the enjoyment of teams trying to skillfully score more points than the other.
    Comments 10 Comments
    1. menace's Avatar
      menace -
      Only problem with this article is that you're merely preaching to the converted as barely a diddly squat of spectators will read it....shame about that, they might have learnt something.
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      Ah, not true. It's running as an advert and already has 524 views via other mediums, & Brian Moore has tweeted about the irony of having to explain 'Clear & obvious".
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      Personally I am not a fan of the clear and obvious mantra.

      What about an offence that is perfectly clear but not at all obvious ? You are going to blow, right..
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      It's something of a tautology. But a useful tool none the less.
    1. ChrisR's Avatar
      ChrisR -
      Even if an event is obvious it is not always clear. Therein lies the difficulty.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      If it is clear that it is a Penalty offence then it is obvious that it is a Penalty offence.

      EG


      You see a punch land: It is both clear and obvious that a punch has landed therefore a Penalty offence has occured.

      Alternatively:

      A player come out of a maul with a bloody nose it is both clear and obvious that something happened. It its neither clear nor obvious what that "something" was.
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear.. But it wasn't obvious
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear. But it wasn't obvious
      It was obvious to you. On the scenario you propose nothing would be C & O as someone somewhere in the ground will not see it. C & O must be seen from the referee's perspective.
    1. Taff's Avatar
      Taff -
      Quote Originally Posted by Robert Burns View Post
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
      That's how I understand it.

      Ie if it's a "grey area" between a clear black and white decision - it doesn't get blown.
  • Recent Activity Widget

    Zebra1922

    Acceptable frustration or sending off?

    Thread Starter: Zebra1922

    Couple of quotes from my match today, would you consider these acceptable frustration from losing teams or tipping into RC territory for implying or saying you are biased? 1. (Following a try after defender tackled a break near the goal line and supporting players scored - I was not over the...

    Last Post By: Zebra1922 15 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    Zebra1922

    Law check - scrum turnover

    Thread Starter: Zebra1922

    I've had several incidents recently when if the ball is turned over in the scrum (i.e. won by the non putting in team) the now defending team immediately rush up beyond the 5m offside line prior to the ball emerging from the scrum. TO me they are all offside as the ball has not exited the scrum...

    Last Post By: Zebra1922 22 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    L'irlandais

    Autumn Friendlies -Ireland v New Zealand

    Thread Starter: L'irlandais

    WTF? Disappointing! 21 minutes CJ Stander is tackled high as he tried to blast through a hole in the defence. Liam Squires went a tad high but Barnes doesn't go for his pocket. 23 minute Whitelock having fallen on the wrong side of the line following the lineout, throws a cynical (basketball...

    Last Post By: The Fat 3 Hours Ago Go to last post
    OB..

    When is the ball out of a ruck?

    Thread Starter: OB..

    Yesterday's training session was a panel-led discussion on what referees, players, coaches and assessors expect of each other. One of the thinbgs that got mentioned several times was consistency, though we found it useful to distinguish "consistency" (by a referee during a game) and...

    Last Post By: crossref 8 Hours Ago Go to last post
    didds

    Kolbe v France

    Thread Starter: didds

    Kolbe v France. https://video.twimg.com/tweet_video/DrzsduLX0AA_fRH.mp4 Thoughts? Post TMO review, it was given as a knock on by SA, scrum to France

    Last Post By: didds 8 Hours Ago Go to last post