• Twitter

  • Understanding 'Clear & Obvious'

    As we approach the start of the 2015 Rugby World Cup in England, we are going to look at what the term 'Clear & Obvious' means to a referee, and the greater team of 4 in general.

    During the world cup, the match officials will be under a greater degree of scrutiny than has ever been seen before, the desire to get every decision correct is there, but perfection is something even that even the best teams have not yet achieved.

    Perfection for a team would surely mean that no player drops a ball, every pass goes where intended, every tackle is made, and every kick is successful. However, as supporters we understand that this is near impossible to do over a full 80 minutes. The dynamics of the game, along with the unpredictability of the opposition defence means that mistakes will happen, but it's how you over come them that really defines the team.
    As match officials, there is very little chance to overcome a mistake, even if the rest of the game is flawless, the referee is remembered for that decision. And in some circumstances, getting the decision correct also gets you bad press, as Alain Rolland saw with his red carding of Sam Warburton. This means that not only do match officials need to make the right decision, they need to be seen to be following a process that persuades the majority of people watching that the decision is correct. In short, the job is harder than it has ever been.

    As match officials, the greatest praise they can generally get is that no one is talking about them after the game, and that all attention is on the players, and the game they played. The desire & need for the team of 4 (including the Television Match Official) to get every decision & non decision right is crucial, and this is where 'Clear & Obvious' comes in to play.

    'Clear & Obvious' in its most simple form means that a referee will only penalise a team for an offence that is beyond doubt. This includes a clear knock-on, to a clear offside, or clearly lying over a ball. If the referee is any doubt, then the decision should be to play on. In the case of a try being scored, there is an opportunity for the referee to check with the TMO should they, or their team, believe there may have been an offence in the build to the try. However, this is only if the team of 4 suspect something, if they have not seen any issues there will be no review.

    In a tight game, 'Clear & Obvious' is more important than the above, it becomes a vital prime directive. A penalty in a tight game can mean points, or the removal of a phase of pressure, so the offence to warrant giving a penalty must be 100% clear in the Referee, or Assistant Referee's mind before calling it. This in itself gives a higher probability of the call being correct, especially in the view of multiple camera angles & slow motion replays to the commentators & watching audience.

    Players & Coaches at the elite level of the game are very supportive of this approach. It allows the players to compete fairly, and to determine the outcome of a game on their own abilities. After all, we all (Including referees) watch rugby for the enjoyment of teams trying to skillfully score more points than the other.
    Comments 10 Comments
    1. menace's Avatar
      menace -
      Only problem with this article is that you're merely preaching to the converted as barely a diddly squat of spectators will read it....shame about that, they might have learnt something.
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      Ah, not true. It's running as an advert and already has 524 views via other mediums, & Brian Moore has tweeted about the irony of having to explain 'Clear & obvious".
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      Personally I am not a fan of the clear and obvious mantra.

      What about an offence that is perfectly clear but not at all obvious ? You are going to blow, right..
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      It's something of a tautology. But a useful tool none the less.
    1. ChrisR's Avatar
      ChrisR -
      Even if an event is obvious it is not always clear. Therein lies the difficulty.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      If it is clear that it is a Penalty offence then it is obvious that it is a Penalty offence.

      EG


      You see a punch land: It is both clear and obvious that a punch has landed therefore a Penalty offence has occured.

      Alternatively:

      A player come out of a maul with a bloody nose it is both clear and obvious that something happened. It its neither clear nor obvious what that "something" was.
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear.. But it wasn't obvious
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear. But it wasn't obvious
      It was obvious to you. On the scenario you propose nothing would be C & O as someone somewhere in the ground will not see it. C & O must be seen from the referee's perspective.
    1. Taff's Avatar
      Taff -
      Quote Originally Posted by Robert Burns View Post
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
      That's how I understand it.

      Ie if it's a "grey area" between a clear black and white decision - it doesn't get blown.
  • Recent Activity Widget

    L'irlandais

    Folauís online comments have taken a turn for the worse.

    Thread Starter: L'irlandais

    APF article carried by a.n. Other online site SYDNEY (AFP) - Sacked Wallabies rugby star Israel Folau Monday (Nov 18) sparked outrage by suggesting destructive bushfires and drought ravaging Australia were "God's judgement" for the legalisation of same-sex marriage and abortion. The devout...

    Last Post By: OB.. 23 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    crossref

    Offside oddity

    Thread Starter: crossref

    Red fly hack the ball through the blue defence and players from both teams chase it blue 7 gets to ball first, tries to gather it but loses control, knocking the ball toward the blue line , (ie no knock on, play on) Blue 9 was chasing behind Blue 7 , ie in front of his team mate who last...

    Last Post By: OB.. 37 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    NormanHurst

    Thrown Backwards, Bounces Forwards

    Thread Starter: NormanHurst

    Question about the laws and hoping the refs on here can clarify for me. Player A throws a long pass out wide towards Player B. The pass is backwards but the ball doesn't reach Player B and then clearly bounces 2-3m forward on the ground, ahead of the line where Player A threw the ball. Player B...

    Last Post By: Decorily 1 Hour Ago Go to last post
    Avg0201

    wallet

    Thread Starter: Avg0201

    Hi all, brand new to reffing - just about to complete the ERRA so am scouring these forums for advice and guidance! Quick question about red / yellow card wallets, and/or score card holders. I bought a set on Amazon but there are really naff, and also don't fit the larger, square cards the...

    Last Post By: Avg0201 2 Hours Ago Go to last post
    Willehj

    Non Competing at a Maul

    Thread Starter: Willehj

    At a line out the team in position catches the ball and sets up for a maul with the ball being moved back to the hind most player in the 'maul'. However the opposing team do not engage in the maul and do not bind in. What is the consequence from a law point of view? 1.Is the ball...

    Last Post By: Decorily 4 Hours Ago Go to last post