• Twitter

  • Understanding 'Clear & Obvious'

    As we approach the start of the 2015 Rugby World Cup in England, we are going to look at what the term 'Clear & Obvious' means to a referee, and the greater team of 4 in general.

    During the world cup, the match officials will be under a greater degree of scrutiny than has ever been seen before, the desire to get every decision correct is there, but perfection is something even that even the best teams have not yet achieved.

    Perfection for a team would surely mean that no player drops a ball, every pass goes where intended, every tackle is made, and every kick is successful. However, as supporters we understand that this is near impossible to do over a full 80 minutes. The dynamics of the game, along with the unpredictability of the opposition defence means that mistakes will happen, but it's how you over come them that really defines the team.
    As match officials, there is very little chance to overcome a mistake, even if the rest of the game is flawless, the referee is remembered for that decision. And in some circumstances, getting the decision correct also gets you bad press, as Alain Rolland saw with his red carding of Sam Warburton. This means that not only do match officials need to make the right decision, they need to be seen to be following a process that persuades the majority of people watching that the decision is correct. In short, the job is harder than it has ever been.

    As match officials, the greatest praise they can generally get is that no one is talking about them after the game, and that all attention is on the players, and the game they played. The desire & need for the team of 4 (including the Television Match Official) to get every decision & non decision right is crucial, and this is where 'Clear & Obvious' comes in to play.

    'Clear & Obvious' in its most simple form means that a referee will only penalise a team for an offence that is beyond doubt. This includes a clear knock-on, to a clear offside, or clearly lying over a ball. If the referee is any doubt, then the decision should be to play on. In the case of a try being scored, there is an opportunity for the referee to check with the TMO should they, or their team, believe there may have been an offence in the build to the try. However, this is only if the team of 4 suspect something, if they have not seen any issues there will be no review.

    In a tight game, 'Clear & Obvious' is more important than the above, it becomes a vital prime directive. A penalty in a tight game can mean points, or the removal of a phase of pressure, so the offence to warrant giving a penalty must be 100% clear in the Referee, or Assistant Referee's mind before calling it. This in itself gives a higher probability of the call being correct, especially in the view of multiple camera angles & slow motion replays to the commentators & watching audience.

    Players & Coaches at the elite level of the game are very supportive of this approach. It allows the players to compete fairly, and to determine the outcome of a game on their own abilities. After all, we all (Including referees) watch rugby for the enjoyment of teams trying to skillfully score more points than the other.
    Comments 10 Comments
    1. menace's Avatar
      menace -
      Only problem with this article is that you're merely preaching to the converted as barely a diddly squat of spectators will read it....shame about that, they might have learnt something.
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      Ah, not true. It's running as an advert and already has 524 views via other mediums, & Brian Moore has tweeted about the irony of having to explain 'Clear & obvious".
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      Personally I am not a fan of the clear and obvious mantra.

      What about an offence that is perfectly clear but not at all obvious ? You are going to blow, right..
    1. Robert Burns's Avatar
      Robert Burns -
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      It's something of a tautology. But a useful tool none the less.
    1. ChrisR's Avatar
      ChrisR -
      Even if an event is obvious it is not always clear. Therein lies the difficulty.
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      If it is clear that it is a Penalty offence then it is obvious that it is a Penalty offence.

      EG


      You see a punch land: It is both clear and obvious that a punch has landed therefore a Penalty offence has occured.

      Alternatively:

      A player come out of a maul with a bloody nose it is both clear and obvious that something happened. It its neither clear nor obvious what that "something" was.
    1. crossref's Avatar
      crossref -
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear.. But it wasn't obvious
    1. Pegleg's Avatar
      Pegleg -
      Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
      If you see a crafty punch to the kidneys, that no one else has noticed, it's clear. But it wasn't obvious
      It was obvious to you. On the scenario you propose nothing would be C & O as someone somewhere in the ground will not see it. C & O must be seen from the referee's perspective.
    1. Taff's Avatar
      Taff -
      Quote Originally Posted by Robert Burns View Post
      It's not mean to be broken down into individual bits. It's a term to mean unless I am 100% sure I am not blowing this whistle.
      That's how I understand it.

      Ie if it's a "grey area" between a clear black and white decision - it doesn't get blown.
  • Recent Activity Widget

    GuildfordRef

    Maul Law 16.8 & 16.9

    Thread Starter: GuildfordRef

    Hi, first post here. Jus returned to reffing after a 10 year hiatus and need some guidance. Today I reffed an Under 14 game their first game of the season so trying to be as generous in spirit as the laws would allow. Red set up a maul. The red ball carrier goes to ground and made the ball...

    Last Post By: Dickie E 17 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    davsas

    U14 uncontested lineout

    Thread Starter: davsas

    Ok, so u14 have uncontested line outs, meaning the opposition cannot compete, but the hooker of the throwing team throws the ball in not straight. Do you penalise as the other team cannot go for it anyway? i didn't and allowed them to play on, as it had no bearing on the flow of the play or...

    Last Post By: mcroker 3 Hours Ago Go to last post
    belladonna

    Kick from 22, when is it inside

    Thread Starter: belladonna

    If the kicker is running forward towards their own 22 (when not taken back in) and kicks to touch, where is the boundary between being "in" and "out" of the 22? Say one foot is still in the 22 and the ball is directly above the line when it's kicked, that's in, right? At what point is it "out" -...

    Last Post By: crossref 3 Hours Ago Go to last post
    Tom Wallace

    Unsporting Conduct Question.

    Thread Starter: Tom Wallace

    Thanks very much for the add. I'm after clarification on an incident that happened at a game I attended last Saturday.I posted this question on a rugby forum and received one reply from South Africa saying that both the referee and refereeing assessor were wrong in the account I gave below. I...

    Last Post By: chbg 5 Hours Ago Go to last post
    crossref

    Gaining advantage by making ball dead

    Thread Starter: crossref

    Russia knock on (adv called ) Time expire Japan kick the ball out Advantage over End of half

    Last Post By: chbg 6 Hours Ago Go to last post