• Twitter

  • Can slow motion replays really make things look worse than they are?

    The recent furore over the Sam Cane v Robbie Henshaw collision in the second test between Ireland and New Zealand got me to thinking about the merits of using slow motion video to make judgements about potential foul play incidents in rugby. I think we have all heard the meme that sometimes, looking at something at full speed gives a better sense of what really happened than watching it in slow motion, and that sometimes, a slow motion replay can actually make an incident look a lot worse than it really was (that is certainly my view on the incident I mentioned above).

    So, I decided to go looking to see what an internet search would bring up on the issue, and not only was I surprised find that it is a real and known effect, but there is also a sound scientific basis for why this happens; it is due to something called "Slow Motion Intentionality Bias". It means that while you are watching a piece of video of an incident in slow motion, your brain is still operating in real time, so your perception of the available reaction time becomes distorted, your perception is that there was more time than there really was. This is not BS, its real, and is becoming something of a worry for criminal defence and prosecution lawyers with the increasing amount of video evidence being shown in courts and legal proceedings.

    Here are the Significance Statement and the Abstract from a scientific study, published March this year, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

    SIGNIFICANCE
    When determining responsibility for harmful actions, people often consider whether the actor behaved intentionally. The spread of surveillance cameras, “on-officer” recording devices, and smart-phone video makes it increasingly likely that such judgments are aided by video replay. Yet, little is known about how different qualities of the video, such as replay speed, affect human judgment. We demonstrate that slow motion replay can systematically increase judgments of intent because it gives viewers the false impression that the actor had more time to premeditate before acting. In legal proceedings, these judgments of intent can mean the difference between life and death. Thus, any benefits of video replay should be weighed against its potentially biasing effects.


    ABSTRACT
    To determine the appropriate punishment for a harmful action, people must often make inferences about the transgressor’s intent. In courtrooms and popular media, such inferences increasingly rely on video evidence, which is often played in “slow motion.” Four experiments (n = 1,610) involving real surveillance footage from a murder or broadcast replays of violent contact in professional football demonstrate that viewing an action in slow motion, compared with regular speed, can cause viewers to perceive an action as more intentional. This slow motion intentionality bias occurred, in part, because slow motion video caused participants to feel like the actor had more time to act, even when they knew how much clock time had actually elapsed. Four additional experiments (n = 2,737) reveal that allowing viewers to see both regular speed and slow motion replay mitigates the bias, but does not eliminate it. We conclude that an empirical understanding of the effect of slow motion on mental state attribution should inform the life-or-death decisions that are currently based on tacit assumptions about the objectivity of human perception.


    I know there are a few of you here with a scientific bent so you might find the whole thing interesting. You can read the full scientific study here (free, not behind a paywall).

    Warning: there is some video in this link that some may find disturbing. Its probably work safe but not child safe - the link itself is safe because none of the video will start automatically.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/113/33/9250.full

    Now, I do not pretend to understand 100% the detailed science in this paper. I had to gloss over quite a bit of the detail as much of it was over my head, but I understand enough to realise that it is a real effect.

    If you find the going too heavy, I suggest you just read...

    ► Study 2 - http://www.pnas.org/content/113/33/9250.full#sec-36
    (which is of particular interest as it deals with professional sport)

    ► The Empirical Summary statement - http://www.pnas.org/content/113/33/9250.full#sec-39

    ► The Discussion Statement - http://www.pnas.org/content/113/33/9250.full#sec-40

    I think this is certainly going to change the way I look at foul play replays in the future.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Can slow motion replays really make things look worse than they are? started by Ian_Cook View original post
  • Recent Activity Widget

    crossref

    Variation on a theme

    Thread Starter: crossref

    Interesting one that happened in wasps Toulouse today Red, attacking 10m from Black ball line, fumble a pass, knock on. Ref plays adv , red get to the ball first and kick it into the Black in goal and over the DBL Restart ... ?

    Last Post By: L'irlandais 19 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    JayBee

    Castres v Munster & Wayne Barnes

    Thread Starter: JayBee

    Not Barnes (& the rest of the team's finest hour). A niggly game in difficult conditions but still. See attached link and scroll down to see the incidents highlighted esp the sliding tackle. Link is to the twitter feed of a Munster fan site but you can judge for yourselves ...

    Last Post By: L'irlandais 31 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    Marc Wakeham

    TMO Protocol

    Thread Starter: Marc Wakeham

    Player grounds the ball against he foot of the post. Refere asks TMO "Is it a try - Yes or No?". TMO grounding is fine BUt the is a player pulled back so no try. Ignoring JUSTICE. Did the officials follow correct protocol inview of the question asked?

    Last Post By: crossref 54 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    vimpe22

    Quick Tap . No tap taken

    Thread Starter: vimpe22

    Law 20.2 2018 Pre. Ref Law 21.2c A penalty or free-kick is taken from where it is awarded or anywhere behind it on a line through the mark and parallel to the touchlines. When a penalty or free-kick is taken at the wrong place, it must be re-taken. Law 20.11 Pre ref, Law...

    Last Post By: OB.. 2 Hours Ago Go to last post
    belladonna

    [VARSITY MATCH] Tackle in open play - player ruled offside

    Thread Starter: belladonna

    I have a question about the Varsity Match last week. An entertaining game, well refereed by Nigel Owens, and won by a country mile by the better team on the day. As an alumna, I'm shouting for Cambridge but - sadly - I can't complain about the result, and have to say well played Oxford. Just...

    Last Post By: Camquin 4 Hours Ago Go to last post