Break out the sunscreen
https://www.limerickleader.ie/news/national-news/1493764/alert-irish-weather-forecast-predicts-temperatures-of-19c-over-next-few-days.html
It looked to me like the ref just wanted to get out of there. Penalties hadn't done it as the attacking team declined shots at goal, so without an attacking knock on, the game would still be going now.
Couldn't see it in detail but a head contact PT in a pick & go situation with bodies...
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGCdP7c7mM/_l4gjbL1CfX4mDqXOvWDDg/view?utm_content=DAGCdP7c7mM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=editor#57
A new resource published by RA. Thoughts?
Slide 21 is interesting. Because you can't have a tackle in-goal (as per definitions), you can't...
If it was 1% then you'd see 99 phases of play in a row which never happens. I reckon its more like 10% which is what the PTB want. If it was any more than that the ball carrying team would be disinclined to take the ball into contact and we go back to aerial ping pong
Its difficult to comment without seeing it.
So Saracens have possession at back of ruck. Ref calls "use it". Bath counter-ruck but unsuccessfully and Saracens still maintain possession.
How much did the counter-ruck disrupt the Saracens SH? If at all, then I'd restart the "use it" once it had...
there is another (my preferred) option. Once the cards are dished out and its all settled down ... restart with the lineout to Blue. That way you're not sending a message that one team is more or less culpable in the whole mess. They're all equally at fault, the miscreants have been dealt with...
I'd consider "wrestling to ground" as FP and ping that. Depending on the severity of Red 3's actions I'll be looking to ping him as 3rd man is.
But consider a melee. Blue player punches Red player, Red player retaliates with a punch, a couple of "3rd men" from both teams join in with some...