Search:

Type: Posts; User: Phil E; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.12 seconds.

  1. Replies
    42
    Views
    783

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    That's a bit hard to sell when he's holding his leg/arm/back?
  2. Replies
    42
    Views
    783

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    Because you are getting absolutely stuffed in the scrums on a wet shitty day, and are quite happy to go a man down if you can have uncontested scrums?
  3. Replies
    42
    Views
    783

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    I would say both.
  4. Replies
    252
    Views
    13,497

    Re: Where are you this weekend - 2019-20

    I am dreading my game on Saturday.....not because of the players, but because of the facilities.

    Last refereed there about a year ago on the coldest day of the year, in wind, rain and snow.
    Came...
  5. Re: Munster vs Southern Kings 14 February 2020. - Yellow card

    It always starts off with just two.
  6. Re: Munster vs Southern Kings 14 February 2020. - Yellow card

    If there are two people fighting just leave them to it.
    Other players running in to "break it up" can only escalate things.
  7. Replies
    252
    Views
    13,497

    Re: Where are you this weekend - 2019-20

    All Staffordshire games cancelled Saturday and Sunday.
  8. Replies
    12
    Views
    598

    [Tackle] Re: Clearout at the tackle

    At a tackle any player on his feet can go for the ball. Alternatively a player may stand over the ball to guard it.

    Any player who gains possession of the ball at a tackle, may in turn be tackled...
  9. Replies
    2
    Views
    310

    [ISSUE] Re: Not able to view my thread?

    This has now been moved to the "was it right" forum.
    A few posts have been deleted, but not any relevant to the discussion in the OP.
    ...
  10. Replies
    12
    Views
    461

    [Junior] Re: Role of the captain in schoolboy rugby?

    U18 game. At the Bullshit remark i'm thinking a good bollocking and a severe warning, possibly yellow depending on what else has gone on previously. At the you got it wrong stage i'm going definite...
  11. Replies
    42
    Views
    783

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    There is no blood replacement with interchanges.

    This is from the Staffordshire Leagues regulations:
  12. Replies
    52
    Views
    1,219

    [Law] Re: Sco v Eng - Scrum back?

    I refer you to my previous answers.
  13. Replies
    52
    Views
    1,219

    [Law] Re: Sco v Eng - Scrum back?

    NO, yet again you are putting words in other peoples mouths.
    I gave some examples to illustrate a point, it wasn't finite.
  14. Replies
    52
    Views
    1,219

    [Law] Re: Sco v Eng - Scrum back?

    Not necessarily.


    The law differentiates between the ball must reach the 5m before being played; and the ball being blocked.

    One is timing, the other is deliberate.

    Players know full well...
  15. Replies
    52
    Views
    1,219

    [Law] Re: Sco v Eng - Scrum back?

    The way i view it is.......

    If the ball doesn't travel 5m its options. i.e. front man caught it before it went 5m, so just bad timing.

    If the ball is prevented from going 5m deliberately, its...
  16. Replies
    8
    Views
    305

    [Law] Re: Theoretical Stalemate

    Put up a deckchair on the half way line, pull out your packed lunch and wait for something to happen.
  17. Replies
    28
    Views
    835

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    No were not off topic, we are exploring situations that might arise from the original question. That's how conversations and discussions develop.

    Off topic would be a completely unrelated...
  18. Replies
    7
    Views
    258

    Re: Fra-Ita: Obstruction question

    A still picture tells nothing.

    Watch it at full speed and the white player is wrong footed and off balance, he wouldn't have made the tackle.
  19. Replies
    28
    Views
    835

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    I have also seen it penalisd at international level.
  20. Replies
    7
    Views
    258

    Re: Fra-Ita: Obstruction question

    Not clear and obvious obstruction for me, I don't believe he stopped a tackle being made.
  21. Replies
    28
    Views
    835

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    That is a phrase that is only applied when you're playing advantage. Not sure what it has to do with this scenario.


    So you don't think the player who hasn't retreated 10m and is offside is...
  22. Replies
    28
    Views
    835

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    What if the ball carrier realised what was happening and passed the ball back into the following opposition player?
  23. Replies
    52
    Views
    1,219

    [Law] Re: Sco v Eng - Scrum back?

    Yes I noticed that.
    Should have been a scrum back surely?
    Unless the ref thought it wasn't "without delay"?

    Law 12
    17. If a 22-metre drop-out reaches the opponents’ in-goal without touching any...
  24. Replies
    26
    Views
    781

    [RWC] Re: RWC .. that Kerevi forearm..

    I thought it was about safety?
  25. Replies
    26
    Views
    781

    [RWC] Re: RWC .. that Kerevi forearm..

    Doesn't that also mean that half of them think your wrong? :chin:
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4