Search:

Type: Posts; User: ChuckieB; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.08 seconds.

  1. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,197

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    the simplest explanations are often the best!
  2. Re: RFU Regulation 15 - 8 MAUL - Use it or Lose it - 5,4,3,2,1.

    As is the case with any situation at the younger age groups, it is likely to be a mess. it serves no purpose to continue any longer than the situation demands, hence the tighter restrictions and the...
  3. Replies
    10
    Views
    291

    [Line out] Re: When is a U!5 line out over?

    The Age grade rules assume the ball is won cleanly and not overthrown, fumbled or otherwise. Outside of that it is use your common sense. The jumper comes to ground, deal with what is there...
  4. Thread: Knock-on

    by ChuckieB
    Replies
    10
    Views
    544

    Re: Knock-on

    There seems to be an asymmetry in the treatment of a ripped ball.

    Not a knock on in respect of the player having the ball ripped and it going forward from his hands, yet

    A knock on in respect...
  5. Replies
    67
    Views
    2,729

    Re: So, about this framework then...

    Two players moving in the same direction. So a reduced "closing" speed. Always likely to make it look less than the protocol sets out.
  6. Re: RWC NZ vs Ireland.. henshaw's fluffed grounding.

    Having seen Wayne Barnes call advantage over for something not dissimilar in a Premiership game, it's worth raising the point again.
  7. RWC NZ vs Ireland.. henshaw's fluffed grounding.

    ...A case of too much advantage?
  8. Re: AUSvGEO - Naisani YC - a reason for concern?

    A lame attempt to bind onto his own player was my initial thought
  9. Replies
    30
    Views
    880

    [RWC] Re: USA/ARG - Offside from kick

    Missed the detail in the OP
  10. Replies
    30
    Views
    880

    [RWC] Re: USA/ARG - Offside from kick

    The English language is a very dangerous tool and open to many interpretations! Could readily sweep up the point where the ball lands as being within the meaning of kick. But a clarification in the...
  11. Replies
    30
    Views
    880

    [RWC] Re: USA/ARG - Offside from kick

    So yes, the ref basically messed up under the correct application of the 10m law.

    law clarification from all the way back in 2011
    ...
  12. Replies
    4
    Views
    442

    Re: England Argentina

    Apart from being on the wrong side viewing a red card tackle and being confident there was no foul play!
  13. Thread: NZ v Canada

    by ChuckieB
    Replies
    30
    Views
    1,118

    [Law] Re: NZ v Canada

    When Read fluffed his lines and was unable to ground the ball, poite reverted to the Standing up infringement. All happened so quickly. So naturally some confusion.
  14. Replies
    13
    Views
    586

    [Law] Re: Ben vs Lei - Red card (Jumper in the Air)

    judicial duties of the Law Lords were transferred following the creation of the the Supreme Court back in 2009.
  15. Replies
    13
    Views
    586

    [Law] Re: Ben vs Lei - Red card (Jumper in the Air)

    Law Lords no longer exist. Keep up!
  16. Replies
    26
    Views
    1,307

    [Maul] Re: uncontested maul

    Surely could be called obstruction even if it wasn't a long arm transfer! Could be seen as a pk offence even if most would perhaps call it accidental offside.
  17. Replies
    12
    Views
    1,010

    [Tackle] Re: Tackling when feet are off the ground

    Clearly jumping into/ over the tackle area to leave the tackler clutching at thin air IMO. Two instances where I thought Garces was both inconsistent, and wrong.

    And hardly consistent with...
  18. Replies
    47
    Views
    3,197

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    Saturday's variation from the Crusaders (forgive the stills)

    3885

    5 & 7 (Whitelock and Todd)

    3886

    Stepped out , Whitelock even out of shot ready to drift back in. Hardly meets the...
  19. Replies
    47
    Views
    3,197

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    Certainly a poor decision and the wrong person driving it, imo. Seeing more these days of team of officials acting in concert rather than just the odd intervention
  20. Replies
    47
    Views
    3,197

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    They can't peel until the ball leaves the hand and must keep moving until the line out has ended. Can't say there could even be any expectation that they are to be thrown or passed the ball. They are...
  21. Replies
    47
    Views
    3,197

    [Line out] Crusaders doing what they do best

    3882 3881

    Crusaders doing what they do best. Should it really be allowed?

    Lineout:



    Taufua goes forward and right
    Barrett heads off forward and right
  22. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,135

    [Law] Re: Toulouse red card.

    Is their opinion expressed around the basis of the decision or the correctness/appropriateness of the laws.

    The two are something different.
  23. Replies
    30
    Views
    2,320

    [Law] Re: Try annulled for foul play

    https://twitter.com/skysportsrugby/status/1112004112940519424?s=21

    unpick this! And the chosen restart and the equity around the joint red cards?

    Should schalk brits have been told to walk?
    ...
  24. Replies
    30
    Views
    2,320

    [Law] Re: Try annulled for foul play

    He is clearly on the comms and it is clearly "stop the game" in the first instance.

    So if it wasn't noise from elsewhere, then it was him calling more than just "stop"

    But hey ho, I don't...
  25. Replies
    30
    Views
    2,320

    [Law] Re: Try annulled for foul play

    clear as day on the tv feed. You can still catch up with the game on ch5 catch up
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4