Search:

Type: Posts; User: Decorily; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.09 seconds; generated 44 minute(s) ago.

  1. Replies
    8
    Views
    231

    Re: offside from rip?

    Yes...

    EDIT Sorry ...misread that thought ball was picked up by 'rippers' teammate!

    So NO!
  2. Replies
    30
    Views
    757

    [Tackle] Re: Open play, non-maul

    Why are you shocked....don't you see player safety out the window in the professional game over and over!
  3. Replies
    30
    Views
    757

    [Tackle] Re: Open play, non-maul

    No..I don't believe it is.
  4. Replies
    30
    Views
    757

    [Tackle] Re: Open play, non-maul

    So Blue 10 ' tackles' a player without the ball...is that correct?
  5. Replies
    20
    Views
    752

    Re: The crusade continues

    Jeez.....there appears to be one or two on this site who think they are on a crusade!
  6. Replies
    16
    Views
    671

    [Law] Re: Penalties and keeping track of them

    15 penalties per team is pretty high.
    Maybe you need to focus more on managing penalties out of the game instead of trying to keep track of the high number!
    Are you vocal enough to be preventive or...
  7. Replies
    27
    Views
    927

    [Law] Re: Law 12.6 Kick off

    Indeed. ...if TV rugby is anything to go by!
    But then again we , in the real world, know better than to follow our well paid colleagues!
  8. Replies
    5
    Views
    276

    [Law] Re: Offsdie oddities #4

    Was this a serious question? ?
  9. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    Is there really any difference whether a team is offside going forward or going backwards!
    The principle is the same either way!
  10. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    My post was in response to Zebra1922 who referred to the law in relation to offside after a knock on.
    Please see post # 2
  11. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    Knocking on the ball or knocking it back is irrelevant. Once the player plays the ball in any form. ... ie with hands, feet or otherwise then any teammate in front of that player is offside and is...
  12. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    I'm all for empathy etc but ignoring something illegal just because someone else doesn’t understand it wouldn't be the way to go in my opinion.
    If this scenario was effectively immaterial then I ...
  13. Replies
    18
    Views
    634

    [Maul] Re: Non Competing at a Maul

    thepercy specifically asked about the scenario ".....and then the defence engages? "
  14. Replies
    18
    Views
    634

    [Maul] Re: Non Competing at a Maul

    But thepercy asked "What if they move the ball to the back and then the defence engages?"...... ie the maul has formed therefore they can't come around as you suggest!
  15. Replies
    18
    Views
    634

    [Maul] Re: Non Competing at a Maul

    How is that relevant?
  16. Replies
    18
    Views
    634

    [Maul] Re: Non Competing at a Maul

    Indeed.
  17. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    Oops....Was responding to OBs initial post but then discovered he had substantially edited it so thought I had deleted my above !!
  18. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    EDIT.
  19. Replies
    58
    Views
    1,405

    [Law] Re: Thrown Backwards, Bounces Forwards

    .....and you're only finishing now???
  20. Replies
    18
    Views
    634

    [Maul] Re: Non Competing at a Maul

    I'd be wary of advising that it's certain that the ball hasn't left the lineout...in some cases it may indeed have left.
  21. Replies
    58
    Views
    1,405

    [Law] Re: Thrown Backwards, Bounces Forwards

    OP gave a very clear and specific scenario and asked a very clear and simple question.
    The correct answer to their query came immediately in post # 2.
    Doesn’t get any better than that.
    Whether or...
  22. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    Only if they are accurate.
  23. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    He can't! !!

    EDIT.... Well he can be put onside but in simplistic terms which is what I think you mean ....he can't.
  24. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,193

    [Law] Re: Offside oddity

    It's simply 2.
  25. Replies
    179
    Views
    7,316

    Re: Where are you this weekend - 2019-20

    I'm obviously missing some prior comments on this but I certainly don't believe that every time a player talks to me that they are trying to influence me.
    Surely players often seek clarification on...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4