Search:

Type: Posts; User: SimonSmith; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.31 seconds.

  1. Replies
    35
    Views
    455

    Re: Inclusiveness in rugby / Paddy Jackson

    If you sup with the devil, make sure it's with a long spoon.

    if you're happy to take all their money, you have to expect that they will have views that they expect to be respected. And if I'm...
  2. Replies
    35
    Views
    455

    Re: Inclusiveness in rugby / Paddy Jackson

    Diageo are the second sponsors.

    They are well within their rights.
  3. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    Ah yes. The way to ensure that rugby is diverse and inclusive. Are there many Asian minority kids playing rugby in England?
  4. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    You're being disingenuous Ian.
    Of course the current Crusaders are associated with the Crusades - that's what all the imagery is about. If they ahd been about any of the links that you posted, they...
  5. Replies
    32
    Views
    1,009

    [Scrum] Re: Uncontested scrums

    Pitches deteriorate. What seemed great prior to kick off can after a couple of scrums not be.
    Among stiff competition, this could be the single worst post I've seen from a referee.
  6. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    So, religious need trumps medical need. OK. Got it. (pun unintended)

    I don't take particular offence to the Crusaders because each side was full of atrocities. But a sensitive team in the modern...
  7. Replies
    32
    Views
    1,009

    [Scrum] Re: Uncontested scrums

    Without knowing more information, I wouldn't second guess the referee. He's a lot closer to it than I am.
  8. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/05/hhs-trump-religious-freedom/588697/

    This. It's an Executive Rule. How, exactly, do you suggest one fight against it?
  9. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    Crock. Of. Shit.

    Christians, generally, in the US are afforded a great deal of freedom. To the extent that it is now being proposed that medical practitioners get the right to deny treatment based...
  10. Replies
    63
    Views
    1,297

    Re: Quick Line out (not quick throw in)

    No. Just...no.
    The lineout law makes that clear.

    They want a dummy hooker. But a lineout can proceed without one, subject to sanction.
    They want numbers to match (or defenders be less). But the...
  11. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    He's making a stand. Either for money, or principle, or both. My bet is the former as I'm not what other skills he has that would pay him enough.

    Enough is enough, frankly. Bigotry has no place in...
  12. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    I was going off this:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2019/06/nrl-slams-door-on-israel-folau-s-hopes-of-nrl-comeback.html
  13. Replies
    528
    Views
    10,858

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Nigel Owens on inclusive rugby.

    We already know their stance - they've said he isn't welcome.
  14. Replies
    63
    Views
    1,297

    Re: Quick Line out (not quick throw in)

    This is covered in Law 18.14:
  15. Replies
    63
    Views
    1,297

    Re: Quick Line out (not quick throw in)

    This.
    The law is specific that two players from each team is all that is required to form a lineout.

    The requirement for the dummy hooker isn't a prerequisite for a lineout to form or start, it's...
  16. Replies
    63
    Views
    1,297

    Re: Quick Line out (not quick throw in)

    Or: Managing a team who are acting compliance with the law.

    If you have a law reference for holding it, then that's what we need. A "surprise" lineout that complies with law is their right; if the...
  17. Replies
    84
    Views
    2,074

    Re: Premiership final

    Not at all. Realistic.
  18. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,042

    Re: Why no red card?

    I think you'll find based on previous red cards that standing your ground is not, in fact, a valid defence.
    I disagree, but that's what red cards have been handed out for.
  19. Replies
    63
    Views
    1,297

    Re: Quick Line out (not quick throw in)

    Assuming all Black are compliant?

    Play on . Stop crying.

    And then maybe have a quick chat with the captain to explain what just happened.
  20. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,042

    Re: Why no red card?

    That's not the only thing that is alien.
  21. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,042

    Re: Why no red card?

    I'm not so sure.
    If Black had pushed Kearney at the point of jumping, or in his jump, I'd agree.

    But Kearney was unimpeded at the point of jumping, and he had time enough to pull out when it was...
  22. Re: Sanctioning Tacklers who are a risk to themselves

    The attacking team don't need any more time, per the article.

    The game is so skewed to attacking teams it's a joke.
  23. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,042

    Re: Why no red card?

    NO says yellow, so clearly not a fair challenge or viable contest.
    Have a look at Hogg's head - simultaneously makes contact with the ground as his shoulder. Head impact? Red.
  24. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,042

    Re: Why no red card?

    https://twitter.com/PremierSportsTV/status/1132365323074711553

    It's red for me.
    No realistic chance for the ball - he's right underneath Hogg.
    Hogg lands with shoulder and head simultaneously.
  25. Re: Giving priority to Youth and Women's matches

    This makes no sense to me (assuming it's true.

    It isn't about prioritizing. If the games stay on Sundays, and referees don't want to do Sundays, what do you do then?
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4