Search:

Type: Posts; User: Arabcheif; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    42
    Views
    936

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    @Crossref, this may shock you. I absolutely, 100%, wholeheartedly agree with you. Absolutely love this comment.
  2. Re: Munster vs Southern Kings 14 February 2020. - Yellow card

    Well it seems the OP is talking about a different incident than in the video shared. Red 20, grabs an opposition number by the scruff of the neck, then grabs his shirt and drags him out. Not his team...
  3. Re: Munster vs Southern Kings 14 February 2020. - Yellow card

    Red 20 hasn't tried to prevent escalation or attempted to de-escalate. He's grabbed his opponent by the scruff of the neck. That said I see it of more a failed strike with the elbow. So Y/C for both...
  4. Replies
    20
    Views
    764

    [Tackle] Re: Pulling through at the tackle

    Oh please no MadRef77, I'm sure I can live with the agreement without anyone making something up. lmao
  5. Replies
    20
    Views
    543

    [Tackle] Re: Not really a tackle but a slide..

    Like I said in my OP. I reckon it's reckless and dangerous. I felt he went in knees first too, that's the dangerous part. The reckless part was the speed of sliding in. He's clearly went in with a ...
  6. Replies
    20
    Views
    543

    [Tackle] Re: Not really a tackle but a slide..

    I see what you're saying and I do agree. The arguments being made are that he's went to ground to get the ball. Which he has when he clatters into the other player. So the grasp isn't really...
  7. Replies
    20
    Views
    543

    [Tackle] Re: Not really a tackle but a slide..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=n2GbJ7G4K_E&feature=emb_logo

    Found a video.
  8. Replies
    20
    Views
    543

    [Tackle] Not really a tackle but a slide..

    Not a tackle. What's everyone's opinion on the incident involving Benhard Janse van Rensburg. I'll try get a video of it but t he description is...

    Chasing a kick in wet conditions. Ball has...
  9. Replies
    20
    Views
    764

    [Tackle] Re: Pulling through at the tackle

    OMG I think we're all in agreement! I'm not sure I've seen this happen before lmao.
  10. Replies
    25
    Views
    1,142

    [Law] Re: Wales Italy 6N 2020; was Biggar offside?

    So fellas, I'm in 2 minds here.

    It looks almost like a TWOL situation, if it is Biggar is offside.
    and
    Its not a TWOL, therfore it's open play and Biggar is not offside.

    The Law says for a...
  11. Replies
    10
    Views
    493

    [6N] Re: Caterpillars getting out of hand?

    @CR - Not too sure how calling "use it" would slow it down. It may take a while for players to adjust. But then they'll stop this daft practice as the ball won't be gone within 5 seconds and they'll...
  12. Replies
    10
    Views
    493

    [6N] Re: Caterpillars getting out of hand?

    I'd suggest a 2 pronged attack on this. A call of "Use it" coupled with preventing the 9 coming to get it... eg it needs to be rolled back by the players (on their feet) from the front to the back....
  13. Replies
    42
    Views
    936

    Re: New Front Row logic tree

    I played in a match earlier this season. Team I was playing against had prop injured. He went off, they didn't have a replacement FR. They went down to 14 players and we went uncontested. If a team...
  14. Replies
    7
    Views
    272

    Re: Fra-Ita: Obstruction question

    He's within a meter. I've seen tackle tackles completed from there. He's not wrong footed he's in the process of changing his footing to make the tackle. I think he may well have been able to latch...
  15. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    So, in terms of off topic. It may not be as much off topic as it can be, but discussing, what if this, what of that diverts from the original question. For me that's off topic. The OP has said the BC...
  16. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    Only time I've ever seen it penalised is if the player has been moving back to an onside position. But we're off topic. The question was Quick tap taken, player tackled after 10m by a retreating...
  17. Replies
    7
    Views
    272

    Re: Fra-Ita: Obstruction question

    3966



    Not quite sure how he's not preventing a tackle here. Blue 22 is clear close enough to make a tackle. There's less obvious obstructions been called when the defenders have been 5m+ away.
  18. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    If he's standing still waiting for the 9 to make his move and not the path of any potential pass - No

    This has been reffed like this in a couple of games I've played in at youth level (U-18) and...
  19. [In-goal] Re: Kicking the ball dead in-goal when the defenidng side has taken it back

    Ah, so touch in goal. I'd say scrum 5m from the try line and 5m from the touch line. Anyone think other wise?
  20. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    Then that would be incredibly stupid of him. He's played the ball as he wished. He's chosen to pass to an opposition player. Same as a 9 who passes to a player at the a ruck who's stood (at the wrong...
  21. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    So he's following. Doesn't seem to be preventing anything or shepherding. If he's close enough to make the tackle at 10m then he's most likely right behind so BC is free to do what he wishes.
  22. Replies
    28
    Views
    888

    [Law] Re: Quick tap penalty

    Yeah, all good. Play On for me. No offside at this point as we're in open play.
  23. Replies
    111
    Views
    3,992

    [Line out] Re: Offside by QTI

    I just think it SHOULD be that a player to take part in the attacking or defending of a QTi they should be the following.

    Attacker - Level with/behind the thrower (on or nearer to his DBL than the...
  24. [In-goal] Re: Kicking the ball dead in-goal when the defenidng side has taken it back

    I'm sorry gents, maybe I'm missing something. Do we mean kicked touch in-goal or over the DBL? As if it's kicked into touch it's a LO? If were are talking about touch in-goal or over the DBL, then 5...
  25. Thread: Taken back ?

    by Arabcheif
    Replies
    19
    Views
    736

    [Law] Re: Taken back ?

    There we go that should clarify. I have to admit I thought there would be no gain in ground, but I stand corrected.


    GAIN IN GROUND


    Either the defending team did not take the ball into their...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4