Search:

Type: Posts; User: Balones; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.07 seconds.

  1. Replies
    55
    Views
    942

    [Law] Re: Knock on into the dead ball area.

    Not if it is made dead.
  2. Replies
    55
    Views
    942

    [Law] Re: Knock on into the dead ball area.

    I can appreciate the different arguments for what ‘should’ be the outcome or what people prefer etc but the debate is rather pointless in my opinion because a 5M scrum is what you have to award...
  3. Replies
    55
    Views
    942

    [Law] Re: Knock on into the dead ball area.

    Only for a scrum advantage.
  4. Replies
    12
    Views
    419

    Re: Pulling a player from the ruck/tackle

    Can’t disagree with you. What is not always heard by the spectators is the ‘management’ of the situation or perhaps a downtime warning.
  5. Replies
    12
    Views
    419

    Re: Pulling a player from the ruck/tackle

    They are allowed because, despite the possible dangers if not done correctly, they are deemed to be a positive action to aid fluidity. There is nothing positive that can come out of ‘pulling’. (As...
  6. Replies
    12
    Views
    419

    Re: Pulling a player from the ruck/tackle

    When you croc roll you have to bind on. Pulling does not involve binding. Hence my first post on this thread. All I, and other posters, are saying is that it is illegal and there are several laws...
  7. Thread: "use it"

    by Balones
    Replies
    7
    Views
    201

    [Ruck] Re: "use it"

    I can tell you that all senior/professional referees are telling/encouraging SHs to do what NO said in the OP. When playing the ball back you have to use your feet snd keep your hands offe ball until...
  8. Replies
    12
    Views
    419

    Re: Pulling a player from the ruck/tackle

    There are several that you could apply outside of Law 15. Try law 9 - 9.20c is fairly specific!
  9. Replies
    12
    Views
    419

    Re: Pulling a player from the ruck/tackle

    No. Without referring to any specific laws -not binding, collapsing ruck, playing player without ball. Usually managed rather than penalised depending on materiality.
  10. Replies
    50
    Views
    1,337

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Reports on Referee post-game on WhosTheRef

    I can say very confidently through experience and some knowledge that the levels on WTR are a VERY rough guide to the level of the match. If it was a NC1 game then we would be appointing anyone from...
  11. Replies
    50
    Views
    1,337

    [Golden Oldies] Re: Reports on Referee post-game on WhosTheRef

    Tyrrells Premier games are appointed by the RFU. This could see anything from a L3-L6 referee and occasionally a L7 if somebody is being fast-tracked.
    Tyrrells Premier Development (2nd) teams are...
  12. Re: Scrum Law 19.28 - scrum half position - your advice please

    I believe Phil that the penalty was against the scrum half for the manner in which he queried the matter of law.
  13. Re: Scrum Law 19.28 - scrum half position - your advice please

    As it was a National League game you could always let the appointments officers know that you think the referee may have misinterpreted the laws and if they feel you are correct then they will ensure...
  14. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,371

    [Line out] Re: Receiver at a lineout

    That should no longer be happening. Since the introduction of a specific mention of 2M instead of a ‘minimum’ i know refs have been asked to marshal the situation more stringently. I raised the...
  15. Re: Scrum Law 19.28 - scrum half position - your advice please

    Ref and player are both partially correct and it is down to timing.
    Laws 19.28a and 19.30b apply.
    At the start of the scrum the defending S/H should be by the tunnel and once the ball is in can...
  16. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,371

    [Line out] Re: Receiver at a lineout

    Even he couldn't do it nowadays. He’s put on weight and not been training so much.:)
  17. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    18.35 is the situation where non-participants must basically get out of the way and go back 10M and not return or interfere with play until the lineout is over. Here the lineout was formed properly....
  18. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    I think you might find that others will disagree with you because the ball will have left the line of touch even if the player that catches the ball hasn’t left the lineout by your definition.
  19. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,371

    [Line out] Re: Receiver at a lineout

    I have always found as a coach that introducing the receiver to do any lifting is fraught with too many dangers, especially in 7s. I can think of far more creative and less ‘dangerous’ (From a law...
  20. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    The defending side are merely avoiding being offside by easing back as the ball comes forward. They cannot be made to go offside. If we accept what you as say is correct then we would have the...
  21. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    If the ball is thrown in and the front jumper merely touches the ball (no knock-on and the ball thrown straight) and the ball is then caught by a player at the back of the line who is standing on his...
  22. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    Since the ball is the offside line if the defensive line do not move back (if they chose not to compete) then they are offside! The lineout is over once the ball has left the line of touch. (If we...
  23. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,371

    [Line out] Re: Receiver at a lineout

    Yes. Because a lineout receiver is deemed to be a lineout participant and once the ball has been thrown the laws explicitly explain what a participant can do. But has it has been implied the laws are...
  24. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,371

    [Line out] Re: Receiver at a lineout

    I’ll let Crossref answer this one.:)
  25. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,806

    [Law] Re: Uncontested lineout drive/ maul - penalty?

    Have a look at 18.32.

    P.S. Welcome
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4