Search:

Type: Posts; User: Balones; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.05 seconds.

  1. Thread: Lineout quiz

    by Balones
    Replies
    43
    Views
    1,194

    Re: Lineout quiz

    I think it is one of those situations where it is legal on TV rugby but doubtful at community level where the laws are applied with a bit more rigour. Assuming that the referee actually knows the...
  2. Thread: Lineout quiz

    by Balones
    Replies
    43
    Views
    1,194

    Re: Lineout quiz

    What I do see quite often is the ball being thrown in when the two lines are set but the receiver is still moving to his/her position. Should we disallow this because the receiver is more than 2M...
  3. Thread: Lineout quiz

    by Balones
    Replies
    43
    Views
    1,194

    Re: Lineout quiz

    Personally because of the ambiguity in the scenario I would be happy for a referee to reset the lineout without penalising.
  4. Thread: Lineout quiz

    by Balones
    Replies
    43
    Views
    1,194

    Re: Lineout quiz

    Seeing as we quite often like to balance on a pin head when it comes to precise meaning of words in the laws, does the 2Ms refer to one foot or two feet away from the line of players? If the...
  5. Replies
    35
    Views
    1,204

    [Scrum] Re: Uncontested scrums

    Weather conditions are considered under regulation 13.6.6 and 13.6.7. Once started the referee has ‘absolute discretion’.
  6. Replies
    35
    Views
    1,204

    [Scrum] Re: Uncontested scrums

    Havenít checked in regulations but the guidance you outline applies to all levels in England as well and it is certainly in my society documentation and that of the Division (Group in old parlance.)...
  7. Replies
    47
    Views
    1,790

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    The laws which I listed being ignored generally are -
    More than one receiver.
    Not continuing to move if peeling.
    Leaving the lineout without exchanging.
    Jumping early.
    Leaving lineout before it...
  8. Replies
    47
    Views
    1,790

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    Fair point but I believe that we (all?) understand what happens dynamically in such scenarios because it is quite a common occurrence now. It is one of those scenarios that seems to be becoming the...
  9. Replies
    47
    Views
    1,790

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    As far as I see the following laws are being ignored. 18.16, 18.17a, 18.20,18.29d,18.38.
    Which of these , if any, should we remove from the law book? Can we replace them by something else?
  10. Replies
    47
    Views
    1,790

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    We are in agreement. I just think that we should get rid of the laws that appear to now be redundant. The law book would be even smaller then. I find it frustrating that if I didn’t point out in a...
  11. Replies
    47
    Views
    1,790

    [Line out] Re: Crusaders doing what they do best

    It is contrary to several laws. If it is not against the law why bother having the law in the first place? Then if the law is not relevant here why not get rid of some of the others that are...
  12. Thread: Forum updates

    by Balones
    Replies
    11
    Views
    534

    Poll: [QUESTION] Re: Forum updates

    Proverb - We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.

    The above is quite a good approach at some meetings.��
  13. Thread: Forum updates

    by Balones
    Replies
    11
    Views
    534

    Poll: [QUESTION] Re: Forum updates

    Where do you get access to such data?

    Do we know to what extent guests use the website? The vast majority of my visits is to simply read what has been said since the last time I had a look. I...
  14. Replies
    55
    Views
    1,709

    [Law] Re: Can't pick and go at uncontested scrums?

    From page 17.

    If during the course of a match a team elects to take uncontested scrums, it must continue to have 8 players committed to each scrum. In addition, only the player in the scrum half...
  15. Replies
    55
    Views
    1,709

    [Law] Re: Can't pick and go at uncontested scrums?

    https://d2cx26qpfwuhvu.cloudfront.net/wru/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/21121603/National_League_Rules_and_Regulations_2018-19.pdf

    Page 17 might be relevant.
  16. Replies
    55
    Views
    1,709

    [Law] Re: Can't pick and go at uncontested scrums?

    I believe Law 3.14 gives them the authority.
  17. Replies
    18
    Views
    788

    [Line out] Re: LO/Scrum Option or FK

    Seems very clear to me. Jumper goes straight up and uses outside arm. - not straight, option.
    Ball thrown straight and jumper uses outside arm -he must have leaned over - FK. No problem if two arms...
  18. Thread: Turning maul

    by Balones
    Replies
    15
    Views
    676

    [Maul] Re: Turning maul

    I think we are in agreement here. I posted the situation because it is one of those that looks wrong and just wondered if anyone did think it should be penalised - just like the opposition and a...
  19. Thread: Turning maul

    by Balones
    Replies
    15
    Views
    676

    [Maul] Turning maul

    Red catch ball at a lineout. A maul is formed. Red drive forward. The maul partially turns. Three Blue players end up on the Red side of the maul. Always bound in/on. The ball is popped out to the...
  20. Replies
    25
    Views
    997

    [Law] Re: Next year's Law Trials

    I do believe that the kicking side used to have the throw in during an earlier period in the game's development. Even possibly when I started playing. OB...? Not to the restrictions outlined in the...
  21. Thread: Italy/France

    by Balones
    Replies
    34
    Views
    1,704

    [6N] Re: Italy/France

    Yes. But in this instance it was clearly a knock-on in the replay. His right forearm knocked the ball forward before the ball touched the ground.

    At games without TMO I would be satisfied with a...
  22. Replies
    3
    Views
    252

    [Law] Re: Italian Disallowed Try v France

    I will repeat my post from the other thread on this incident.

    My initial opinion was that the referee had got it wrong because as far as I was concerned it was hit backwards and out of the hands...
  23. Thread: Italy/France

    by Balones
    Replies
    34
    Views
    1,704

    [6N] Re: Italy/France

    My initial opinion was that the referee had got it wrong because as far as I was concerned it was hit backwards and out of the hands of the ball carrier by the tackler and it should have been play...
  24. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,361

    [Law] Re: routine question...

    Well if it was rugby league I believe we’d have a try.
  25. Replies
    37
    Views
    1,361

    [Law] Re: routine question...

    That law is about ‘doubt’ rather than ‘simultaneous’. With doubt you don’t know. With simultaneous you know.
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4