Search:

Type: Posts; User: WoodyOne; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Thread: Arm protect

    by WoodyOne
    Replies
    11
    Views
    574

    [Tackle] Re: Arm protect

    For padding in authorised areas (i.e. shoulders, shin pads) the reg is no more than 5mm when compressed and with no rigid elements. For any other padding (such as this) the reg is no more than 5mm...
  2. Replies
    10
    Views
    869

    Re: TWOL - who is part of the tackle?

    I agree with what seems to be the consensus here i.e. that the ball is out. So why bother joining a thread that is resolved?

    Because I want to opine on what I think is a red herring about whether...
  3. Replies
    49
    Views
    4,279

    Re: Collapsing Rucks

    I think that it's potentially illegal under 15.16b, but it's possible to execute legally.

    Illegal when it's (e.g.) a lift with a twist and a collapse onto the ruck.

    Legal when the lift...
  4. Replies
    16
    Views
    1,208

    [Tackle] Re: ‘Through the gate’

    They're drawn to illustrate what anyone who talks about The Gate is talking about (in my coaching experience at least). I think we all agree that they aren't defined in Law. My point is that if you...
  5. Replies
    16
    Views
    1,208

    [Tackle] Re: ‘Through the gate’

    Is this image helpful? Clear offside lines either side of a ruck (or tackle). 5 positions from which a player might join. All of which would be moving from the direction of their own goal line. But E...
  6. Replies
    16
    Views
    1,208

    [Tackle] Re: ‘Through the gate’

    I don't think that there's reason for confusion here. Continue to ref with that picture of the gate in your head. It just isn't spelled out becuase of the 'simplification' of the language for 2018. ...
  7. Replies
    29
    Views
    2,688

    [Tackle] Re: Offside line at a tackle

    Yes, great suggestion. It would also create a discipline of the posts actually being answers to the question in hand!
  8. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    It seems to be missing from Android version too
  9. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    So what is anyone on this thread going to do in their next game, when there is TWOL, and the 9 picks the ball up but doesn't move away / pass / kick? I'm--to be very clear--not being serious about...
  10. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    I don't see that it meets the definition of a ruck -- no England players engaged so it fails the 'at least one player from each team' test. So tackle with offside lines IMO
  11. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    I don't think that the gate is specifically defined in the laws but is implied by the definition of the offside lines, and seems well understood by most players and coaches.
  12. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    Having reviewed the video of the Courtney Lawes charge again (several times!) I have shifted position from a "fair call" to thinking it was harsh (and am saying this whilst recognising first that...
  13. Replies
    158
    Views
    11,319

    Re: Are TMOs Ruining Things

    I don't think this should be seen as contentious or strange: the picture is clear and this is consistent with the ball carrier and tackler on the ground being used to define the 'gate' (if we are...
  14. [In-goal] Re: Defender driven back into his own in-goal grounds the ball..

    Amen to that. Thanks Phil for the summary. Whilst I appreciate that there isn't always consensus, when it can be reached and concisely articulated as you've done, it is a great help.
  15. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,845

    [Tackle] Re: Offside after a tackle

    Agree with the consensus that the kick puts blue onside.

    To answer the second part of the original question, if the deflection was a blue charge down this would put him offside again, due to...
  16. Replies
    32
    Views
    2,606

    [Law] Defender lifting ball carrier in open play

    Quick question - is there any law prohibiting a defender lifting and holding a ball carrier up with their feet off the ground to stop them going to ground? In effect to stopping contact becoming a...
  17. Thread: Illegal studs

    by WoodyOne
    Replies
    66
    Views
    4,622

    [Kit] Re: Illegal studs

    World Rugby's performance criterion testing requirements and lack of a "kite mark" to indicate boots that pass means that manufacturers are self certifying that a boot sold as suitable for rugby...
  18. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,907

    [Ruck] Re: Jackling - valid or too late?

    Great responses. And helpful. I think I was probably being a little harsh given Phil E's law citation of 15.11. And I will look out for jacklers who are looking for the penalty. Thanks everyone.
  19. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,907

    [Ruck] Jackling - valid or too late?

    From my game on Sat, White had a flanker who was a good jackler and frequently quick and well positioned but wasn't quite hitting the mark for me. I'd like to work out if I was being harsh. In...
  20. Re: ball knocked out of players hands... play on or knock on?

    Thanks guys. Good to see a unanimous set of responses that support my in-the-moment decision.
  21. ball knocked out of players hands... play on or knock on?

    My game today. Big high kick from Black giving onside attacker time to make progress up the pitch and contest the ball. Ball clears the Gold full back, so he has to turn and chase and is in a 1-1...
  22. Replies
    3
    Views
    836

    [Scrum] Scrum law change and impact on 20.6(d)

    Hoping a few more experienced heads can help with this question.

    The prior 20.6(d) states "The scrum half must throw in the ball straight along the middle line, so that it first touches the...
  23. Replies
    61
    Views
    10,989

    [Law] Re: Quick Kick-Off after penalty try

    I had this happen in a L10 game today. Penalty try but I elected not to YC. However was still taking a moment to explain my decision and then jot down a few notes. Looked up and the 9 had scooted off...
  24. Replies
    39
    Views
    5,427

    Re: Eng vs Aus - Disallowed Hooper try

    Because 11.1(a) is clear that if there is no interference then there is no sanction. And a flanker running a line diagonally across the pitch towards an a anticipated breakdown might be in front of...
  25. Replies
    39
    Views
    5,427

    Re: Eng vs Aus - Disallowed Hooper try

    I think that calling his movement 'sideways' is being a little generous. Looking at the playback, he advances from being a good 5m (the directional stripes on the grass are 5m wide) short of the 22...
Results 1 to 25 of 25