Search:

Type: Posts; User: Decorily; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.06 seconds.

  1. Replies
    18
    Views
    295

    [Scrum] Re: Scrum to the team 'Going Forward'

    No...
  2. Replies
    18
    Views
    295

    [Scrum] Re: Scrum to the team 'Going Forward'

    The only line that's relevant in defining 'attacking team' is the half way line!
  3. Replies
    51
    Views
    2,410

    [Law] Re: Hand Off or Fend to the face/head/neck

    [QUOTE=Balones;367379].....struck out...../QUOTE]
    Enough said!
  4. Replies
    51
    Views
    2,410

    [Law] Re: Hand Off or Fend to the face/head/neck

    Off the ball as described. ...what more do you want to hear?

    Edit. ...Unless you want to differentiate between yellow and red!
  5. Replies
    23
    Views
    337

    [Junior] Re: U14 Rugby - Lineout

    In IRFUland there is no lifting in the lineout but there is a 'contest' and a maul may be formed.
  6. Replies
    93
    Views
    1,840

    [Law] Re: Knock on into the dead ball area.

    You seem to be implying that you base certain decisions on how a team are performing.....level out the playing field as such!
  7. Replies
    38
    Views
    1,056

    [Law] Re: Place of Conversion kick

    Better go to uncontested kicks then just to be sure!
  8. Replies
    9
    Views
    253

    Re: Bound in but not bound (Maul)

    A player caught in a maul does not also have to be bound and therefore is entitled to come through the maul, 'swimming' or otherwise.

    Therefore IMHO, as I understand it, the Assessor was incorrect.
  9. Replies
    9
    Views
    253

    Re: Bound in but not bound (Maul)

    Well if he's caught in as opposed to bound on then 'swimming' doesn't apply!
    The term 'swimming' refers to a player changing binds to move along/around the side of the maul.
  10. Replies
    6
    Views
    162

    [Law] Re: KO deliberately not going 10

    He gave the scrum followed by a RED!!😆
  11. Replies
    38
    Views
    1,056

    [Law] Re: Place of Conversion kick

    But really he/she wasn't making it more difficult they were making it easier by getting better ground!

    Edit... Having said that I really don't think I would not allow it!
  12. Replies
    9
    Views
    275

    [Kit] Re: High Leg boots Quins v Clermont

    Haven't seen them.
    Studs are, or should be, checked at all levels.
    Sounds like something I wore about 45 years ago....mine I'm sure were about three times as heavy and made entirely of black...
  13. Replies
    11
    Views
    361

    [Law] Re: Is there a definition of a kicking tee?

    # metoo
  14. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    Not when I'm referring anyway!

    I remember once being challenged by a 9 after a game as to why I was insisting he stay so far back from the OS line at the scrum.
    I was unclear what he was...
  15. Replies
    51
    Views
    2,410

    [Law] Re: Hand Off or Fend to the face/head/neck

    - - - Updated - - -



    Urban myth I believe[/QUOTE]

    In some regions there are some variations with regulations which stipulate no hand off above shoulder height.
  16. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    I've been refereeing for years and can safely say I've never seen a scrum that looked as pretty as that image! !

    Are you serious?
  17. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    Couldn't have put it better myself!
  18. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    Even if this were the case it is a different issue... the fact remains that the flankers feet /foot is not the offside line and it is inaccurate to state it as so.

    As an aside isn't the flankers...
  19. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    Your Senior ref advisor may be confused about the 9 getting into the 'pocket ' between the flanker and the body of the Scrum.
    The flankers foot is not the offside line.
  20. Replies
    20
    Views
    466

    Re: Can I Clarify The Offside Line.

    I don't think this is correct.
  21. [Law] Re: Penalty offence by team that didn't knock on while playing advantage for the KO

    I'm gonna award Red the Scrum with a word to Red 9 that they might want to be careful about intentionally knocking on because next week they could have a pedantic ref who may penalise them !!
  22. [Law] Re: Penalty offence by team that didn't knock on while playing advantage for the KO

    Even more innocuous offences such as time wasting are include also.....which I suppose is exactly the point I am trying to make ( poorly obviously! )
    So when I am TJing /ARing and the Ref tells his...
  23. [Law] Re: Penalty offence by team that didn't knock on while playing advantage for the KO

    It's just that in my experience it seems a lot of people consider foul play to be limited to offences such as striking an opponent, high tackles, dangerous clear out a ruck and such like 'physical '...
  24. [Law] Re: Penalty offence by team that didn't knock on while playing advantage for the KO

    For clarity would you mind defining 'foul play ' as per your understanding.
  25. Re: Scrum Law 19.28 - scrum half position - your advice please

    You know you're in for a noisy game if there is a scrum half on the pitch....as for 2 of them!!!
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4