Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: about arguments on forums...

      
  1. #21

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,258
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Received)
    1470

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    Quote Originally Posted by Rushforth View Post
    You make a good point about how the forward pass will continue to be refereed in practice, Ian_Cook. Wayne Barnes would agree with you about outlier ideas!
    I was thinking more of those who advise other referees to interpret the Laws in such a way that the outcome fits their personal agenda.

    For example,those who don't like the fact that a knock-on into in-goal is a scrum 5m with the defending team put in, who then argue that the referee should play advantage as a subterfuge then call it over to award the defending team a 22DO instead. This is the type of advice that young/new referees could frankly, do without

    As for Barnes, well his blind spot when it comes to his understanding (or rather lack thereof) of what constitutes a forward pass is out there for all to see.
    "Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed"
    - Jay "Utah" Windley

  2. #22

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,425
    Thanks (Received)
    136
    Likes (Received)
    1686

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian_Cook View Post
    I was thinking more of those who advise other referees to interpret the Laws in such a way that the outcome fits their personal agenda.

    For example,those who don't like the fact that a knock-on into in-goal is a scrum 5m with the defending team put in.
    Or those that just can't let an argument lie without bringing it up in multiple posts in last twenty four hours , with a little bit of name calling.
    And Ian you are being disingenuous, you know very well that a knock on INTO the ingoal is covered explicitly in the Law. Our long discussion was about whether the same law should apply to a knock on INSIDE the in goal.
    But really there is no need to have the argument again, there are no new facts to bring in

  3. #23

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,258
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Received)
    1470

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    I'm really more concerned with making sure that we don't give bad advice to young, new referees who come here looking for guidance.

    Whether or not you can prove that you are right in your clever reading of the Laws and your outlier ideas on interpretation, is inconsequential to me. However, if you are giving referees advice to rule AGAINST normal practice so that you can show people what a clever wordsmith you are, then at best, you are confusing the person seeking advice, and at worse you are taking them down a path that will not only lead to them making errors on the field, it could even affect their assesments.

    Either way, you are doing them no favours.
    "Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed"
    - Jay "Utah" Windley

  4. #24

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,425
    Thanks (Received)
    136
    Likes (Received)
    1686

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    Well, on that argument(do we have to have it again) it was you who is wordsmithing the advantage law, to try and show that you can't get an advantage by kicking the ball out for a 22DO.
    Anyway new refs are perfectly capable of reading the discussion and making up their mind, and this is such an obscure event and ambiguois law that no assessor is going to get too upset about a mistake made by a novice ref.

  5. #25

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,258
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Received)
    1470

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    I wasn't the one advising departure from normal practice!!
    "Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed"
    - Jay "Utah" Windley

  6. #26

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,425
    Thanks (Received)
    136
    Likes (Received)
    1686

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    We don't disagree on normal practice and i have said many times the normal practice is to give the scrum. We were arguing about whether that is supported by Law

  7. #27
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Cambridge and St Neots
    Grade
    I am a Fan
    Join Date
    08 Mar 11
    Posts
    1,357
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    212

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    22.7(b) and 22.13 make it clear that an attacking knock on into or in the in-goal lead to a scrum restart.
    But because the laws are a random stream of consciousness with no real structure or cross referencing, it is possible to miss this.

    You could possibly still argue about a knock on into TIG or over the DBL, as if there was a knock on into touch you would now offer options - and it is not totally clear if you should do this in-goal.
    If I ever meet an attacker who is enough of a klutz to do this, I may decide the ball went backwards and therefore give the drop out.

    The TJ keeping his flag up if the thrower steps into the field of play is 6.B.5 Exception 1.
    Though this does not cover starting in the field of play. I manage this by asking them to step back and they do.

  8. #28

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,425
    Thanks (Received)
    136
    Likes (Received)
    1686

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    Ians argument was actually based on Law 8

  9. #29

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,258
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Received)
    1470

    Default Re: about arguments on forums...

    Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
    We don't disagree on normal practice and i have said many times the normal practice is to give the scrum. We were arguing about whether that is supported by Law
    Good. Just as long as you don't advise people otherwise. If it is normal practice, I don't really care if it is supported by Law or not

    - We allow the acting scrum half to pick up/dig for the ball while it is still in a ruck/scrum
    - We allow the line-out thrower to have his feet on the touchline
    - We PK a player who enters the side of the tackle even if he does not play or attempt to play the ball

    None of these are supported in Law.
    "Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed"
    - Jay "Utah" Windley

  10. #30

    Promises to Referee in France
    L'irlandais's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    CT Alsace-Lorraine
    Grade
    EdR + LCA
    Join Date
    11 May 10
    Posts
    4,300
    Thanks (Received)
    36
    Likes (Received)
    214

    Thumbs down Re: about arguments on forums...

    Is it not ironic that a discussion about reducing the number of arguments on these forums, for the sake of public image, should end in an off-topic argument?
    WTF?
    "We demand strict proof for opinions we dislike, but are satisfied with mere hints for what we’re inclined to accept."
    John Henry Newman

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •