Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

      
  1. #21

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    LSRFUR
    Grade
    10
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    14,682
    Thanks (Received)
    99
    Likes (Received)
    1364

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Once the ball is clearly won, the scrum half could play it
    Instead we are accustomed to watching him reposition it with his foot for a while, until it is in the perfect position

    I'd rather watch him get on with it, really

  2. #22

    Referees in America
    Not Kurt Weaver's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Ohio
    Grade
    C3
    Join Date
    11 Sep 08
    Posts
    1,759
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    79
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisR View Post
    Once the ball is clearly won then I have no problem with moving the ball back by hand or foot. When players are stacked in the ruck to provide more depth for the box kick how else is the SH going to move the ball to the hind foot?

    C'mon let's just get it back in play.


    The players in the ruck could, well dare I suggest, use the skill of rucking as defined in law. And the SH or his teammate acting of his behalf can remain on side.

    I understand, let's just it back in play, but it all is already in play, a ruck is play.

  3. #23

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    LSRFUR
    Grade
    10
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    14,682
    Thanks (Received)
    99
    Likes (Received)
    1364

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Repositioning it on the ground with you foot is delaying getting it back into play
    That's why I am not a fan

  4. #24

    Resident Club Coach
    didds's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    N/A
    Grade
    Club Coach
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    9,020
    Thanks (Received)
    47
    Likes (Received)
    775

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Quote Originally Posted by Not Kurt Weaver View Post
    The players in the ruck could, well dare I suggest, use the skill of rucking as defined in law. And the SH or his teammate acting of his behalf can remain on side. .
    I do agree. The issue here though for whatever reason the modern ruck has become less of a method of driving the opposition back and away leaving the ball available but more of a way of protecting tackled ball and hiding it with bodies. Yes - that's down to coaching - but opposition latching and stacking (unpinged) means its often not possible to drive past a ball.

    didds

  5. #25

    Resident Club Coach
    didds's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    N/A
    Grade
    Club Coach
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    9,020
    Thanks (Received)
    47
    Likes (Received)
    775

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Put another way... s/halves digging around whether with hands or feet is an outcome not a primary cause.

    If refs across all levels of the game were instructed to, and did, blow for tactics that create static rucks rather than dynamic ones and thus promote a drving anc clearing phase of play the ball would appear, and more quickly, far more often.

    And no, I don't coach latching (=> standing over and holding onto the tackled player I mean here), stacking and bridging. But other sides clearly do.

    didds

  6. #26

    Referees in America
    thepercy's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    New York State Rugby Referees Society
    Grade
    Level 1
    Join Date
    21 Sep 13
    Posts
    528
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    68

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisR View Post
    Once the ball is clearly won then I have no problem with moving the ball back by hand or foot. When players are stacked in the ruck to provide more depth for the box kick how else is the SH going to move the ball to the hind foot?

    C'mon let's just get it back in play.
    The new guidance in the USA is below:

    When the ball is won:

          1. the scrumhalf can move the ball back by using their foot – ball is not out.
          2. If they use the hand to roll the ball back it is considered to be out.

  7. #27

    Referees in Scotland


    Soc/Assoc
    None
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    20 Dec 17
    Posts
    133
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    31

    Default Re: When could a #9's digging in ruck become hands in?

    Quote Originally Posted by didds View Post
    Put another way... s/halves digging around whether with hands or feet is an outcome not a primary cause.

    If refs across all levels of the game were instructed to, and did, blow for tactics that create static rucks rather than dynamic ones and thus promote a drving anc clearing phase of play the ball would appear, and more quickly, far more often.

    And no, I don't coach latching (=> standing over and holding onto the tackled player I mean here), stacking and bridging. But other sides clearly do.

    didds
    In my experience dynamic rucks are frowned upon. You sometimes get more of these at lower levels of the game, but if I let them go on (all fair play, rucking, counter rucking from inside players, on their feet etc.) I get coached I let the ruck go on too long and should have blown earlier for an offence or unplayable. It seems referee coaches (and coaches in general) don't like long, dynamic rucks even if they are completely in line with the laws of the game.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •