Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Lineout not 5m

      
  1. #21
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Cambridge and St Neots
    Grade
    I am a Fan
    Join Date
    08 Mar 11
    Posts
    1,232
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    185

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    Oxford used the short line out option in the Women's match -I believe the ball did just go 5m

  2. #22

    Referees in Wales
    Taff's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Llanelli District
    Grade
    WRU Level 2
    Join Date
    23 Aug 09
    Posts
    6,699
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Received)
    281

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    Quote Originally Posted by Camquin View Post
    Oxford used the short line out option in the Women's match -I believe the ball did just go 5m
    As long as it went 5m that's fine. "Just" 5m is good enough.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinky View Post
    For me, the key issue for the sanction is who stopped the ball going 5m.
    I agree Pinky, but I reckon the only people we need to concentrate on is the thrower and the 2 players at the front of the LO.

  3. #23
    Rugby Club Member Rich_NL's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Rugby Nederland
    Grade
    WR level 2
    Join Date
    13 Apr 15
    Posts
    718
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    158

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
    This has always been an anomaly, and an ambiguity in the Law .
    It a shame that the 2018 Law Book made worse by forgetting to give any sanction for blocking the throw .
    Is this in the spreadsheet?

  4. #24
    Rugby Club Member Rich_NL's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Rugby Nederland
    Grade
    WR level 2
    Join Date
    13 Apr 15
    Posts
    718
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    158

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
    This has always been an anomaly, and an ambiguity in the Law .
    It a shame that the 2018 Law Book made worse by forgetting to give any sanction for blocking the throw .
    Is this in the spreadsheet?

  5. #25

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    LSRFUR
    Grade
    10
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    15,205
    Thanks (Received)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    1451

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    I think it is .
    Its not so much a change as an omission

  6. #26

    Referees in England
    Nigib's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Oxfordshire
    Grade
    Level 7
    Join Date
    02 Jul 07
    Posts
    340
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    68

    Default Re: Lineout not 5m

    Quote Originally Posted by Taff View Post
    As long as it went 5m that's fine. "Just" 5m is good enough.


    I agree Pinky, but I reckon the only people we need to concentrate on is the thrower and the 2 players at the front of the LO.
    It's not just the front two - also the jumper in the front pod reaching over and catching/trying to catch ahead of the oppos. FK for prevention, options for inability.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •