Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 59

Thread: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

      
  1. #11

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,829
    Thanks (Received)
    139
    Likes (Received)
    1776

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?


  2. #12

    Resident Club Coach
    didds's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    N/A
    Grade
    Club Coach
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    9,727
    Thanks (Received)
    64
    Likes (Received)
    937

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    that's there all the time.

    That IS an official 2019 release then? as opposed to being the 208 version available during 2019? WR have said this is superceding all previous editions (or some syuff about maybe just improving on the 1923 law book or whatever...)

    didds

  3. #13

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,829
    Thanks (Received)
    139
    Likes (Received)
    1776

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Yes if you follow the download link and download the pdf you will find that you have the 2019 Law Book

    The online pages have also been updated where appropriate.

    There aren't many changes from 2018 to 2019 .. tjere is a thread in the Laws forum that lists them (do keep up , didds!)

  4. #14

    Referees in Wales
    Taff's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Llanelli District
    Grade
    WRU Level 2
    Join Date
    23 Aug 09
    Posts
    6,915
    Thanks (Received)
    34
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
    Yes if you follow the download link and download the pdf you will find that you have the 2019 Law Book. The online pages have also been updated where appropriate.
    So, if it's meant to be a change why isn't it marked as a change?
    Last edited by Taff; 16-01-19 at 21:01.

  5. #15

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,829
    Thanks (Received)
    139
    Likes (Received)
    1776

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taff View Post
    So, if it's meant to be a change why isn't it marked as a change?
    They have marked the changes from 2018 to 2019

    (well most of them, see the thread, a couple of corrections were unmarked)

    The Law on Mark is unchanged from 2018 to 2019

  6. #16

    Referees in Wales
    Taff's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Llanelli District
    Grade
    WRU Level 2
    Join Date
    23 Aug 09
    Posts
    6,915
    Thanks (Received)
    34
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by crossref View Post
    They have marked the changes from 2018 to 2019 The Law on Mark is unchanged from 2018 to 2019
    And we know there was no change from 2017 to 2018, so it should still be a "clean catch".

  7. #17

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    17,829
    Thanks (Received)
    139
    Likes (Received)
    1776

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    It's 2019, taff, we have to finally put the 2017 Law Book behind us now.. what does it matter what it said?

    They made a couple of corrections to the 2018 book and published the 2019 Laws ..that has to be the end of it all..

    In 2019 we must all ref to the 2019 Law Book .. anything else is madness
    Last edited by crossref; 16-01-19 at 23:01.

  8. #18

    Referees in Australia


    Soc/Assoc
    Brisbane Rugby League Referees Association
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    27 Jul 13
    Posts
    998
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Received)
    207

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dickie E View Post
    even if he fumbles it forwad, hits goal post & then regathers, looks OK

    A player may claim a mark even if the ball hits a goal post or crossbar before being caught.
    Almost certain this part of the law means the ball can be kicked, hit a post, and then caught for a mark. It's not meant to allow a knock forward to be claimed as a mark.

  9. #19

    Referees in Australia
    Dickie E's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    VRRA
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    19 Jan 07
    Posts
    12,475
    Thanks (Received)
    113
    Likes (Received)
    1335

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by leaguerefaus View Post
    Almost certain this part of the law means the ball can be kicked, hit a post, and then caught for a mark. It's not meant to allow a knock forward to be claimed as a mark.
    well, its not a knock on cos ball hasn't hit ground or another player. So it's just a fumble (aka an unclean catch).
    I, for one, like Roman numerals

  10. #20

    Referees in Australia


    Soc/Assoc
    Brisbane Rugby League Referees Association
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    27 Jul 13
    Posts
    998
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Received)
    207

    Default Re: MARK - Is this a valid mark ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dickie E View Post
    well, its not a knock on cos ball hasn't hit ground or another player. So it's just a fumble (aka an unclean catch).
    Interesting - I didn't realise in union that the posts don't count for the purpose of ruling a knock-on.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •