Search:

Type: Posts; User: Flish; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.17 seconds.

  1. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Of all the challenges I have on pitch this isn’t one, no need to change it
  2. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    No, that's not what I said, that's you putting words in my mouth to suit your narrative - see my my earlier point :-(

    There are multiple ways of communicating, speaking is a key one - there's...
  3. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    How do you get to that conclusion? There’s plenty of ways of communicating it to the players before you make the official signal, me, I tend to verbalise it before deciding next action. Probably the...
  4. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: Global Law Trials

    Ha, yes, I have seen, and asked - and got confused looks! No one at my club has any fixtures planned and keeping August as traditional pre-season training so I'm not advertising the option! I'll...
  5. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: Global Law Trials

    Past experience mostly, age grade coaches generally aren't aware of law changes until communicated via their channels, and whilst I can't recall specific examples I'm sure there were cases in other...
  6. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Why do you do that? sneak in extraneous words to try and get other people to agree to your narrative? You know we can see through it right? I've reworded it to something closer;

    ... i think I...
  7. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: The Times - new laws

    Is that covered here though (I’m not sure what the example videos are saying when they talk about levering, is this ok or not?) as a croc roll doesn’t target or directly put weight on the lower limbs...
  8. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: Global Law Trials

    defender = member of the team not in possession? Not officially defined but a reasonable understanding
  9. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: The Times - new laws

    Have to assume so, we were discussing it at training tonight (Level 6/7 standard players) and no one could realistically see how you’d be hitting the lower legs with a legitimate clear out, you had...
  10. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: Global Law Trials

    I've asked the question as to whether this applies to the age grade laws in RFU land as normally we take U19 laws and uphold them unless specifically told different. The WR site just says 'All...
  11. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Re: Global Law Trials

    Agree with all of them, think the kick into goal then grounded will catch a few out. It also means we're legitimising the croc roll (before it was arguably illegal in a couple of areas but never...
  12. Replies
    79
    Views
    1,828

    Global Law Trials

    Some homework for the next month https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/global-law-trials although most of the videos aren’t working for me.

    Some new interpretations around latching too, flying...
  13. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    And :deadhorse: …. Any negative outcomes as a result of his cowardice?
  14. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Can’t see any negative outcomes as a result of the ref’s action in either of those, are you trying to bolster your argument or everyone else’s !?
  15. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    I think you’re looking for a problem to a solution!

    If someone goes down with a serious injury is your first instinct arm out for a scrum restart? If it all kicks off and fists everywhere do you...
  16. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Why, it does it’s job of communicating the decision to the crowd? The only problem (which you seem to see more than most) is the point in time when the ref chooses to make that signal? If some refs...
  17. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Comparing Apples with Oranges though aren’t you? Wasn’t there a flare up / handbags to deal with then? Here there’s no suggestion of that, he has an AR as close to the situation as him, so not really...
  18. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,525

    Re: Protocol awarding PT

    Nothing unusual there was there? The call was reasonable, he / the team got the number of the player, so under the sticks and card issued, or am I missing something?
  19. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,044

    Re: Upcoming law changes

    Would be nice, same with the 10m, or even flags in the TJ's hands! Trouble is I get so used to not having a combination of some of the above I get into a habit of not looking for them
  20. Replies
    23
    Views
    1,044

    Re: Upcoming law changes

    Good luck, in my games I have enough trouble judging where it landed let alone where it started!
  21. Replies
    5
    Views
    530

    [CLUB RUGBY] Re: Uncontested scrum / numbers debarcle

    I think that’s a misquote / misinterpretation - the fact that it’s a YC means they will drop another player (not the case in other RFU leagues), if they were losing the player due to head injury or...
  22. Replies
    19
    Views
    881

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    Yup, happens, had one Friday night, 5 called, 6 in - claimed he was the receiver, at the end of the line :shrug:
  23. Replies
    5
    Views
    530

    [CLUB RUGBY] Uncontested scrum / numbers debarcle

    Interesting touch line conversation, accusations of cheating and everything. Thought Ian Tempest managed it well really - was Pat Lamb trying to pull a fast one and gambled on the wrong option?
    ...
  24. Replies
    19
    Views
    881

    [Line out] Asking for Numbers

    At a line out I ask the throwing captain (or pack leader) for numbers in the line (primarily as I need to know this) and pass this information on to the non throwing team, I believe this is the...
  25. Thread: New Touch Laws!!

    by Flish
    Replies
    23
    Views
    1,851

    [Law] Re: New Touch Laws!!

    So in effect that's caught the ball and taken into touch? Half ends, as not the same as touched backwards into touch?
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4