Search:

Good point.

I said that referees should have seen the book well before the release date. Nothing had changed my mind. This discussion shows it to be a pile of pants.

Yet earlier you categorically stated "lt becomes a ruck". Etc. Make up your mind.

The X Files strike again

So the ref orders the player from the field. As the laws allow him to do already. The point is that . With out the replacement yoou could not use ca false HIA to your advantage.

The sy stem is open to abuser. Why did we have it in place anyway? Apart from the front row. Where there are safety implications why allow a player to come back on? If you use your replacements and...

Things like the lack of communication regarding the 2018 law book can be a big issue . But generally in darkest west Wales we are ok.

Ref said "check your own boots"
Don't belive it

"Ref turned up late"
Possible late change. I on e was a late sub turning up 30 mins late only go t the game at 2.20 10 mins before ko.

"No...

I think this one is not going away. WORLD RUGBY needs to revisit it.

Still nothing official from the WRU. I hope the rest of you get better luck from your unions.

That could easily be changed.

Sadly, whilst a daft call , it is not odd for World Rugby given their track record.

That was not the question it was:

So it would be interesting to know why officials let him wear them?

So that's what the signal for a crooked scrum feed signal looks like!:deadhorse:

Another pointer is inlcuded in the Matrix:

Infringement / stoppage
Failure to “use it” at scrum, ruck or maul.

Location of scrum
In the scrum zone at the point closest to where the scrum,...

For me this is why:


20.6 (g) Specifically deals with the 5 second use it scenario


2017 Book

20.6 (g) If the ball carrier in a maul goes to ground, including being on one or both knees or...

17.6 (g) second paragraph and NOT 17.6 (c) is the crucial law here.

Amen!

The question was "which statement is wrong?"




http://www.rugbyrefs.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3674&d=1514707476&thumb=1

So saying that the team taking tbe ball in loses ir in this...

The side failing to use the ball does not get the reward of the scrum. Common sense!

Indeed not. That is why WR tried to stop the time wasting tactic. To suggest that they get a second benefit would be stupid.

The point of the above post is that kids would not be stupid enough to...

Well yes clearly he failed. But you not answered the question:


"WHY?"

Those photos, from several games, all show what looks like gloves to me. Than you. So it would be interesting to know why officials let him wear them.

A picture would be helpful.

Come on kids would not be that stupid.