Search:

Type: Posts; User: didds; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.13 seconds.

  1. Thread: Penalty Try

    by didds
    Replies
    22
    Views
    431

    Re: Penalty Try

    I can think of times when the PT is awarded for an action within the in goal area, but Id accept theyd be very extreme and frankly unlikely - somewhat chopperesque scenarios (I _think_ the in goal is...
  2. Thread: Hand-off heights

    by didds
    Replies
    9
    Views
    163

    Re: Hand-off heights

    ... and then next in line is a ball carrier appraoching inevitable contact dips early and twists sideways, hands and arms against the chest holding the ball (ie no elbows.forearms etc) and ends up...
  3. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,092

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    spot on marc.

    allied then to any proposed changes being actually tested somewhere instead of just globally applied - to then learn the laws of unintended consequences AGAIN. Fair enough trials do...
  4. [Law] Re: When and why the intentional knock-on rule was added to the rugby laws?

    You might say that - I couldn't POSSIBLY comment.

    ;-)

    OK I will. Over jealous and unempathetic refereeing. A total lack of understanding of what had just happened, and why the interpretations...
  5. [Law] Re: When and why the intentional knock-on rule was added to the rugby laws?

    no doubt because of the elite end harsh interptations seen on TV, I once witnessed a winger carded for a deliberate knock on 15m out from the opponents line in an attempt at a interception and...
  6. Replies
    16
    Views
    408

    [Law] Re: France v England - 30/4/2021

    It must be said that the coverage of these women's games while hugely welcomed has had a lot of waffling going on. I also appreciate there may well be an element of introducing a new...
  7. Replies
    16
    Views
    408

    [Law] Re: France v England - 30/4/2021

    and I think she was very lucky to not get a RC I agree.

    is there a case to be made (quasi devil's advocate) that Cleal (white) holding onto the leg destabilised the blue player who fell and was...
  8. Replies
    16
    Views
    408

    [Law] France v England - 30/4/2021

    Another debating point

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxQHwC9m20&t=3770s

    As you start to run the YT video keep an eye on poppy cleal on the floor - as the camera zooms she is into the left...
  9. [Law] Re: When and why the intentional knock-on rule was added to the rugby laws?

    And its how it is universally interpreted and applied - nobody can be in any real doubt.

    I personally think being dominant at a scrum is sufficient for the purposes of disrupting the oppo ball...
  10. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,092

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    I watched it again to "make sure".

    if the #8 did it is certainly not at all clear and obvious, and i'd be very confident in saying she didnt. If anything she is still, at the whistle, trying to...
  11. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,092

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    bah. i didnt travel forward in time by 900 years - apologies!
  12. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,092

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    Pretty much my take on both scenarios.

    I think that #9 in scenario 2 knew exactly what she was doing. She is seemigly a bit antsy after her subsequent chip ahead went stright into touch and...
  13. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,092

    [Law] England v France - 24/4/2921

    Couple of points from last weekend's Eng v Fra women's 6N game I thought worth a chat about...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiHt_gWJoqw&t=2950s
    played on, no To4 response at all. Marginal ?...
  14. Thread: yellow card?

    by didds
    Replies
    5
    Views
    321

    Re: yellow card?

    I appreciate Balones is trying to find a reason for a YC.

    the problem with his excellent attempt is that




    So the ref says there is a high level of force, so Balones splend attempt doesnt...
  15. Thread: yellow card?

    by didds
    Replies
    5
    Views
    321

    Re: yellow card?

    that they appear to have gone from nailed on reds a few weeks ago to suck a finger, stick in the air, consider the phase of the moon compared to high tide at skegness, and then make it up as they go...
  16. Replies
    16
    Views
    423

    Re: Covid Law Variations for England

    Yeah.

    But Bert the secocnd row doesn't think "oh, what law is that under?" when he is considering latching or not. Or watching his opposite number doing it.

    And lets face it - we see...
  17. Replies
    16
    Views
    423

    Re: Covid Law Variations for England

    its the PS that is what I was getting at.

    The law simply says

    "Players must not bind onto a team-mate who is in possession of the ball. Sanction: Penalty kick."

    but in a latch, a player is...
  18. Replies
    10
    Views
    496

    Re: Championship - no citing?

    not significantly though. an inch or two? Faz didnt start by aiming at his chest with his shoulder and the head drop a foot ...
  19. Replies
    10
    Views
    496

    Re: Championship - no citing?

    at best there is a vague wrap. But that's no "help" here. Head connection with force, tackler remains upright, no mitigation.

    RC.

    I cant comment about whether the chammpionship has different...
  20. Replies
    16
    Views
    423

    Re: Covid Law Variations for England

    you might say that, I couldnt POSSIBLY comment
  21. Replies
    16
    Views
    423

    Re: Covid Law Variations for England

    OK. so accepting these are interim and temporary laws to aloow games to happen, to be clear when the law now requires

    Players must not bind onto a team-mate who is in possession of...
  22. Replies
    16
    Views
    423

    Re: Covid Law Variations for England

    Law 16: The Maul is suspended in its entirety
    Players must not bind onto a team-mate who is in possession of the ball. Sanction: Penalty kick.

    so in reality when a team A player has the ball and...
  23. Thread: wheeling scrums

    by didds
    Replies
    11
    Views
    413

    Re: wheeling scrums

    yep. agree. But



    i merely provided another reason to do so. Yes, reliant on not getting caught.

    But then
  24. Thread: wheeling scrums

    by didds
    Replies
    11
    Views
    413

    Re: wheeling scrums

    Except to win a penalty of course if this is clear how its to be blown.
  25. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    "accidental" is still not a word in the protocol, and was repeated as an explanantion by the ref (alebit accpeting this isnt her first language).

    I thought the ref had a good game overall. But...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4