Search:

Type: Posts; User: Marc Wakeham; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.07 seconds.

  1. [Maul] Re: When is a flying wedge a maul...a maul a flying wedge....or....?

    Well actually we started with:
    The …”difference from a maul and a flying wedge under the new laws.” Post one
    We moved to:
    “A maul which no longer has any defenders bound is still a maul even...
  2. [Maul] Re: When is a flying wedge a maul...a maul a flying wedge....or....?

    THis ruling was given back in 2014 (not on the wR site anymore):
    IRB clarification for teams choosing not to engage at the lineout
    • if the defenders in the line out choose to not engage the line...
  3. [Maul] Re: When is a flying wedge a maul...a maul a flying wedge....or....?

    How can you pull a maul down that does not exist?
  4. Thread: 50:22

    by Marc Wakeham
    Replies
    9
    Views
    456

    [Law] Re: 50:22

    Indeed so why so much fuss?
  5. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,648

    [In-goal] Re: Goal line DO vs Scrum 5

    Well yes, that broke this week.
  6. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,648

    [In-goal] Re: Goal line DO vs Scrum 5

    Seems to be in line with the WRU.
  7. Sticky: Re: POTENTIAL SPONSORSHIP - Referee Watch - Great bit of kit

    Used mine for the first time, having missed two months due to injury, Really enjoyed using it. I've used the "assessor" appat my club games to help wit hthe ref feed back reports and it really helps...
  8. Replies
    7
    Views
    220

    [In-goal] Re: DBL question

    Just been trawling through and here is the establishing of the principle that the GL and DBL are treated the same. I think it logical that this applies in all incidents.


    Clarification 5...
  9. Replies
    7
    Views
    220

    [In-goal] Re: DBL question

    I seem t oremember a clarification some years ago confirming this. Not sure but it is in the memory from somewhere.
  10. Re: 2 incidents - Wallabies v Springboks 18/9/21

    1st worth a look.

    Second RED 100%
  11. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    In fact most were not.
  12. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    All several of us have done is found failings in your wife's idea. Only was the sort of "we don't do that sort of thing in rugby. Others were valid exposing of faults.
  13. Replies
    19
    Views
    599

    [Law] Re: Age Grade Variations

    You need t otake that up with whoever cascades information down to you and your peers.
  14. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    Not sure this is relevant. If an Idea is good, why not? For me this is simply a bad idea on its own terms.
  15. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    Indeed take Ps and try for DGs One converted try = 7 points / three kicks = 9 points Why not look for 9 rather than 7. Also you could get a P/ DG DG and then a convered try to end the ban period...
  16. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    NO it is different. If yo uare convicted of a crime a sentence is paased. If you get 12 months (Accepted you will serve 6 unless bad behaviour Daft but consistent) you serve the sentence according to...
  17. Replies
    19
    Views
    599

    [Law] Re: Age Grade Variations

    From the document page 1 I'd say:


    When? from August 2021.
    Where U14-U18 in England
  18. Replies
    19
    Views
    495

    Re: an idea from her-indoors

    No makes the pounishment arbitrary and unequal.

    Tow players deliberatly knock on. One serves 10 min, the other serves 1 min. How is that consistant?
  19. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    Unless the throw is taken as soon as the lineout is formed, the non-throwing team may not have more players (but may have fewer players) in the lineout than the throwing team. Sanction: Free-kick....
  20. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    Covered in law. The other side must have time to adjust or no offence. see law 18.14.
  21. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    You are required to call numbers (or manage as per the law) That means you have to count. Not assume anything. If you assume you are making it up.

    Assessor Question: "Red put 2 men in the line...
  22. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    If you clained a 4 mand was actually 7 you'd lose all credibility You've also told both sides that yoy are going to treat all line outs as full unless they do your job for you. You've just lost...
  23. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    So, if you decide that a punch is only a free kick you are correct? I'll let your assessor comment on that one!

    Sole judge of fact does not mean you can make up the laws. Their intentions are...
  24. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    YOu manage numbers buy having the option of a warning for the firat offence if it ios not material or going for a FK if it is. If the throw in comes to early then you have no offence to mannage...
  25. Replies
    64
    Views
    2,580

    [Line out] Re: Asking for Numbers

    That's why I used the wording I did.
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4