Search:

Type: Posts; User: Decorily; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.12 seconds.

  1. Replies
    17
    Views
    538

    Re: Refs returning after lockdown

    Personally not worried about the virus. Have refereed 4 games since September and once common sense is applied I don't believe the referee is unduly at risk!!

    On a side note, here in IRFUland all...
  2. Replies
    18
    Views
    356

    Re: vitual crowd noise

    It's not actually played in the stadium is it? Just added to TV?
  3. Replies
    8
    Views
    304

    [Maul] Re: Rolling maul question

    I thought that was the point of the game never mind the maul!
  4. Re: Free kick from mark kicked directly to touch after time has finished?

    I stand to be corrected. ..and please do.

    Firstly....only Law Change that I am aware of this year is the 'scoring at base of the post!
    Edit... didn't actually edit!!!!!
  5. Replies
    14
    Views
    334

    Re: When is advantage over

    It's still down to the discretion / opinion of the referee as to when /how to apply advantage to a great extent.
  6. Re: Free kick from mark kicked directly to touch after time has finished?

    Well England players seemed to think the LO should be taken.... I however disagree!
  7. Replies
    14
    Views
    334

    Re: When is advantage over

    Absolutely the Captain could have asked....
    Would the request have been granted? Well in my opinion yes... and if I were the referee definitely!
  8. Replies
    8
    Views
    304

    [Maul] Re: Rolling maul question

    Not necessarily a bad thing. They can be in a prime position to prevent the ball being made available if the maul should collapse!!
  9. Thread: COVID Whistle

    by Decorily
    Replies
    11
    Views
    361

    [Kit] Re: COVID Whistle

    Those masks remind me of something. ....
  10. [Line out] Re: Frances first try against Ireland - Should we have gone back for a lineout?

    [QUOTE=Martin Doughty;371877
    .... hit the ball back in-field ...../QUOTE]

    I think this is the relevant bit!!

    Edit....and of course the plane of touch is relevant.

    Can't view the video for...
  11. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    Time is irrelevant.

    Edit....match winning or otherwise is definitely irrelevant!
  12. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    You are asking some good questions. ...challenging!

    We seem to agree that Green was 'juggling' therefore deemed to be in possession.
    So therefore blue simply took the ball and gained possession....
  13. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    If the green player had deliberately slapped/tapped/otherwise propelled the ball forward in an attempt to gain an advantage by preventing the blue player gaining possession then it would have been a...
  14. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    Attempting to gain 'control' might be a better way of putting it.....but yes the player is deemed to be in possession and is tackleable!
  15. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    No, not at all.
    I'm simply referring to my experience of the use of the term 'foul play'.

    Edit....my real time impression was that it should have been a penalty try. I've seen one replay and saw...
  16. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    The term 'foul play ' is widely misunderstood and often misused.
    I think generally when it is used iit is meant to mean 'dangerous play'.
  17. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    Yes....I think we agree
  18. Replies
    46
    Views
    1,287

    Re: deliberate into touch after knock-on

    I didn't see it as green knocking it forward deliberately or otherwise.
    No more so than if he had been juggling to control a ball at chest height etc.
    Possibly when I see a replay I'll change my...
  19. [Law] Re: when is a throw forward not a throw forward?

    Well surely the operative word is 'intentional'!
  20. Replies
    15
    Views
    820

    Re: Exeter v Wasps .. penalty

    You absolutely are allowed comment on inadequate performances and decisions that affect the result.

    There is only one way that a referee can 'predetermine' an outcome and that is cheating!!!!
  21. Replies
    3
    Views
    244

    [Ruck] Re: rilling theball back with the hand

    It was being policed recently but as far as I'm concerned it's a matter of getting on with it and if that means using the hands then so be it!
  22. Replies
    15
    Views
    820

    Re: Exeter v Wasps .. penalty

    Out of order!
  23. Thread: substituicion

    by Decorily
    Replies
    24
    Views
    951

    [Law] Re: substituicion

    I'm sure you are correct!
  24. Thread: substituicion

    by Decorily
    Replies
    24
    Views
    951

    [Law] Re: substituicion

    Law 3.34 that you refer to states that "The number of interchanges must not exceed 12"
  25. Thread: substituicion

    by Decorily
    Replies
    24
    Views
    951

    [Law] Re: substituicion

    That would never happen 😉

    Indeed it seems in the scenario described that "all substitutions" have already been made so my initial answer is incorrect! !!
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4