Search:

Type: Posts; User: Marc Wakeham; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.05 seconds; generated 34 minute(s) ago.

  1. Replies
    29
    Views
    582

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    It is high time that WR admits the massive cock up the simplification of 2018 was. They need to go back to the 2017 book and compare it to the current book and come up with a definitive version.
  2. Replies
    13
    Views
    800

    Re: New Rugby Roadmap

    We all have different "road maps" Who invented such stupid names? The thread was bound to go off topic.
  3. [Law] Re: When and why the intentional knock-on rule was added to the rugby laws?

    It is in my personal opinion that I think that for me that the possible fact that a law might not be refereed correctly is not a reason for removing it. It is a reason for applying in correctly....
  4. Replies
    29
    Views
    582

    [Law] Re: England v France - 24/4/2921

    I'd ping the tackle as dangerous. You don't neeed to go beyond the "H" for it to be so.

    For the the PK. I think she thought or was trying to imply she was playing advantage. Either way it was not...
  5. Thread: rewarding

    by Marc Wakeham
    Replies
    5
    Views
    250

    Re: rewarding

    From me ithe use of "reward" impies the use of the scrum as a penalty winning machine rather than "positive" play . So, teams destabalize and then drive so it is often difficult to stay up etc.
    ...
  6. Replies
    11
    Views
    375

    Re: wheeling scrums

    If you think it is because two props are dominating the other two. Call the stronger ones out: "Look guys you two are far too strong for the LHPs / THPS. Nothing wrong with your scrummaging you're...
  7. Replies
    8
    Views
    558

    [Law] Re: Neverending rugby?

    Very true.
  8. Replies
    8
    Views
    558

    [Law] Re: Neverending rugby?

    And theses days most sides ( at the semi and pro levels) have a kicker who is more than comfortable kicking that sort of distance.
  9. Replies
    8
    Views
    558

    [Law] Re: Neverending rugby?

    Scenario 1
    Team A 21 Team B 12 Team B score with 81 on the clock. Clear and Obvious Foul play after the score by team A. B convert Score 21-19. restart with the PK. Why not? a converted penalty...
  10. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    Superb detail and matches my impressions.

    Incidentally, I also have the ref watch and find that very good in trial situations. Can't wait for the chance to use it "in the middle of the park"
  11. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    I find the MOD app really intuitive.
  12. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    I took a look at that one on Android. Seems messy to me.
  13. Replies
    80
    Views
    2,854

    [Law] Re: Clarification 1 "021

    Looks pretty clear to me.
  14. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    Deleted.
  15. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    I've got bot the MOD app and the ref watch app I've also been trialling them watching videos of some 6N games. It's a tidy piece of work.
  16. Replies
    117
    Views
    5,350

    Re: France Vs Wales

    Interesting point interestingly made.
  17. Replies
    117
    Views
    5,350

    Re: France Vs Wales

    National Captain? Of course not. How could that ever be considered.
  18. Replies
    117
    Views
    5,350

    Re: France Vs Wales

    You mean like an international with over 52 weeks worth of bans that gets reductions based on his "good record". Could never happen. Of course you are right.

    Of course you chose to ignore that the...
  19. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    Or a 'score' in a more advantageous position![/QUOTE]

    Which it didn't either a point already made.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Yep. That's on the money.
  20. Replies
    117
    Views
    5,350

    Re: France Vs Wales

    A well paid "journeyman" enforcer. Paid to take a red for the team here and there. Not a bad earner. Back in the day every team had an enforcer. Getting paid for it as well. Plead guilty take nice...
  21. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    Notice the wording on a PT A PT is obviously in a "better position" than most tries but the law does not allow for that it is SPECIFIC. IF WR wanted it different it would say something like " Where...
  22. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    What was the reason given for the PT? Was there a TMO review? Did you see the actual game footage rather than these short highlights? Only the TV captions show it wa given a PT. If it was given...
  23. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    Equity does not mean total disregard for the law. The law is written for a reason. Whether it might have been a "better outcome" is not relevant. The law does not allow it.
  24. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    THe option was a yellow card. An option WB should have taken, in my opinion.

    Please read the PT law and then try to justify the awarding of a PT on the basis of law.

    You've made two claim in...
  25. Replies
    90
    Views
    4,060

    Re: France v Scotland

    YC I agree. But what legal basis are you claiming
    for a PK restart?
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4