Search:

Type: Posts; User: Flish; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Replies
    21
    Views
    359

    Re: Premiership relegation set to be suspended

    No, it’s more complex than that (read the BBC article I linked to earlier), but part of that includes;



    Each club gets B shares
    Every club gets five A shares for every year they are in the...
  2. Replies
    21
    Views
    359

    Re: Premiership relegation set to be suspended

    I think it’s more there’s an opportunity for someone to buy if they want, eg Bristol or Irish
  3. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    It's the most obvious way out, if considered deliberate or reckless then there can be no mitigation. If you can get mitigation to apply then it's not a red therefore citing doesn't apply (at least...
  4. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    Not convinced on the mitigation either, however thatís subjective - at least we know now that it should have been a sanction on the framework
  5. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    As an aside, I think the Italian player (if it’s Maria Magazzi) has been cited, outcome not yet known
  6. Replies
    21
    Views
    359

    Re: Premiership relegation set to be suspended

    I don’t know if it’s changed, but there’s multiple share types, with options to increase certain shares based on your length in the premiership (which in turn affects your revenue), and options to...
  7. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    There’s and RFU webinar doing the rounds with Wayne Barnes, walking though a lot of examples, talking through the process, considerations, degrees of danger etc - long, but worth a watch...
  8. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    I'm assuming - and could be wrong - that degree of danger correlates to the force of the impact - in that the impact in the ladies game was lower than that in the RC example
  9. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    Ignoring the RC example, and framework alone I get to PK - low degree of danger, but I wouldn't argue if someone gets to YC.

    I would like to know what the outcome of the teams's review of the...
  10. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    No significant height drop, and blue has run in from a few meters so arguable time to adjust, it wasn't passive in the sense that blue was intending to tackle and / or drive into touch, and the other...
  11. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    Last weekend? Women's 6 nations has only been going 2 weeks I think
  12. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    This was my understanding, and happy to adjust my approach .... if we’re all being consistent!
  13. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    If you follow the flowchart then the degree of force isn’t considered until the point of deciding on sanction, so minimum is PK. If in the ladies game they had decided just PK then fine, I could...
  14. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    So, again using the flowchart, are we supposed to classify a tackler arriving in an upright position as foul play? Player at fault, is the secondary wording on the flowchart? Therefore wrong decision...
  15. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    Well, this one was a red card - because he targeted a upright tackle https://www.rugbydump.com/news/referee-overrules-tmo-to-red-card-player-who-is-off-the-field-for-hia-and-stitches/

    Am I missing...
  16. [Tackle] Re: Head clash, with force, "accidental" = no card? women's 6N

    If you follow the new flowchart, and decide no foul play, then it’s play on (which I agree with here) but has there not been cards for similar head on head clashes in the prem?
  17. Thread: 6.11.A

    by Flish
    Replies
    13
    Views
    391

    [In-goal] Re: 6.11.A

    Need to gain an advantage though? But maybe an attacking player runs into a sub warming up, prevents a tackle, therefore attacking team gain an advantage therefore try?
  18. Thread: Watyagonnado

    by Flish
    Replies
    17
    Views
    584

    Re: Watyagonnado

    Don’t disagree, I’m assuming the refs decision making around the injured player on the pitch has already gone to pot so ignoring that aspect ��
  19. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    This is why the initial app is a generic referees watch / phone app, all sports, customisable and generic and free to all - with the possible monetisation plan, maximum audience, maximum feedback,...
  20. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    For this app, individual ref / coach (A society targeted version could be done but would be a different product and rugby specific), all functions would be on watch / phone. A society based app...
  21. Re: Match Official Developer App - your input please

    Interesting comments, Iím in the early stages of a generic Apple Watch referees app that will also work as a phone / tablet app, it will also have a pro mode where dictation and timeline export would...
  22. Replies
    80
    Views
    1,924

    [Law] Re: Clarification 1 "021

    Agree, if the ball is dead, or effectively dead, and no quick tap then why not, just like I’d let them make subs, get everyone set, and restart when ready.
  23. Thread: Watyagonnado

    by Flish
    Replies
    17
    Views
    584

    Re: Watyagonnado

    See, I was inclined to play on (based on the players and effect the bounce had) as doesn’t look like anyone was disadvantaged (wider angle view may change that opinion) but sure, can understand the...
  24. Replies
    90
    Views
    3,250

    Re: France v Scotland

    But as this thread shows, there are scenarios where a PT could (should?) be given, certainly in the ‘more advantageous position‘ scenario where it’s not, I think there would be a lot more PT’s if...
  25. Replies
    90
    Views
    3,250

    Re: France v Scotland

    I think some have missed my point, we’re talking about scenarios where we know, in law, that PT’s aren’t given, when they could technically be, but an actual try has been and that’s what we award. ...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4