Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Caterpillar

      
  1. #1
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Yet to join
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    08 Oct 11
    Posts
    226

    Default Caterpillar

    Amongst many issues with the ruck currently, clearly the growth of the caterpillar is one area that could be reviewed and managed differntly.

    Should a ball being fed back in the caterpillar be considered out of the ruck and in the open?

    At times we see 3 or even 4 players extending the "ruck" clearly there is no real bind and the ball is manipulated into a to position even handled with impunity. If we wish to see a closer game with fairer competition for the ball then this practice should be refereed differently. Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Coach/Referee

    Soc/Assoc
    None
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    03 May 13
    Posts
    1,097

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    Quote Originally Posted by BikingBud View Post
    Amongst many issues with the ruck currently, clearly the growth of the caterpillar is one area that could be reviewed and managed differntly.

    Should a ball being fed back in the caterpillar be considered out of the ruck and in the open?

    At times we see 3 or even 4 players extending the "ruck" clearly there is no real bind and the ball is manipulated into a to position even handled with impunity. If we wish to see a closer game with fairer competition for the ball then this practice should be refereed differently. Thoughts?
    Like it or not it is a ruck....or at least closer to a ruck than a lot of what passes as a ruck these days! !
    Are there technically illegal actions occurring....probably. But the same applies as any other aspect of the game....we need to facilitate the 'getting on with it ' otherwise there would be no game!
    My opinion....I'm certain others will disagree!

  3. #3

    Referees in Scotland


    Soc/Assoc
    None
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    20 Dec 17
    Posts
    598

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    I’m not sure how you can change the laws to stop this but it would help if redress enforced the binding law. Hand on is not bound, Immediately call the ball out.

    if nothing else it will slow players up leaving the caterpillar.

    Change the use it to 2 or 3 seconds would also help.

  4. #4
    Rugby Club Member Rich_NL's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Rugby Nederland
    Grade
    WR level 2
    Join Date
    13 Apr 15
    Posts
    1,424

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    In some cases there's the question of whether this is also valid for a tackle-with-offside-lines - it's a blind spot in the laws at the moment, but moving the ball away from the tackle area should mean open play again.

  5. #5

    Referees in England


    Soc/Assoc
    --
    Grade
    Grassroots
    Join Date
    14 Sep 09
    Posts
    19,003

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    Quote Originally Posted by Zebra1922 View Post
    I’m not sure how you can change the laws to stop this but it would help if redress enforced the binding law. Hand on is not bound, Immediately call the ball out.

    if nothing else it will slow players up leaving the caterpillar.

    Change the use it to 2 or 3 seconds would also help.
    the ref could declare the ruck as 'won' and from then no new player could join the ruck, no player could leave the ruck, and the winning team have [3] seconds to use it

  6. #6
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Cambridge and St Neots
    Grade
    I am a Fan
    Join Date
    08 Mar 11
    Posts
    1,504

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    In almost all cases the 9 is offside while positioning the ball.
    Mind you most of the players in the ruck will be off their feet.

  7. #7
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Yet to join
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    08 Oct 11
    Posts
    226

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    I am mixed in my thoughts as the defending team you want to get the ball as far away from people like Itoje, who will always be aggressive in charging kicks down, as you can. But for the game to be competitive you have to give them a chance. One of the biggest issues currently is the lack of policing at the back of the ruck so I would like to see back foot, as opposed to mid ruck, enforced much more stringently for the tacklers. Then to ensure the game is swifter just apply the laws as currently written, outlaw caterpillars as not part of the ruck and call the ball out immediately the scrum half has the ball available thereby ensuring the scrum half gets on with it.

    I also think the angle of people joining rucks is extreme, you just see the way people come flying out and it's not N/S, these hits are not well policed and the same with staying upright, supporting own weight and jackling.

    Recent incidents, red cards, and injuries, Willis, would suggest it is time to change something if only the attitude.

  8. #8

    Referees in Australia
    Dickie E's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    VRRA
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    19 Jan 07
    Posts
    12,990

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    we have just received our Game Management Guidelines for 2021.

    Where a caterpillar is being created (our document calls it a "train") the instruction to us is that the 'use it' call (& commencement of 5 second countdown) should be made once the ball is clearly won and not once it is at the back of the caterpillar. So, upside is that you are getting the ball away from Itoje; downside is you are consuming your 5 seconds.
    I, for one, like Roman numerals

  9. #9

    ELRA/Club Referee


    Soc/Assoc
    None
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    08 Nov 18
    Posts
    219

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    I agree with Decorily, the caterpillar is, at least more akin to a ruck than some other stuff that goes on. However the perceived problem could be solved by using existing law. I dont understand why we allow the scrum half to move forward of the back foot of the last person in the ruck and dribble the ball through the caterpillar. If a caterpillar is formed (and legally bound), it constitutes part of the ruck, in which case they must ruck the ball to the rear of the formation with their feet before it can be played by the scrum half. The current situation seems to be another area where professional referees have had to be given guidance by World Rugby to solve a problem that was made by encouraging the same referees to ignore primary laws.

  10. #10

    Referees in England
    Balones's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Leics
    Grade
    NP Performance Reviewer
    Join Date
    24 Oct 06
    Posts
    1,015

    Default Re: Caterpillar

    It has been clear to me for some time that players like Itoje have been literally overstepping the mark at rucks when a S/H has been trying to kick. However, I believe that it has been let go because on the vast majority of times the ball has got away so play has been allowed to continue. Recently Itoje in particular has been pushing his luck at the back foot of the ruck and in the last couple of internationals has proved to be successful at charging down the S/H kick. This has led to a greater focus in what has been happening by coaches and have discussed the area with referees and Unions etc. The result was that, especially in last weekend’s WvE match the referee was clearly paying more attention to the back foot offside line than he did in the previous E match that he officiated in. By spending extra time on monitoring the back foot offside line he thereby allowed more time for a ‘train’ to form.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •