Agree, if the ball is dead, or effectively dead, and no quick tap then why not, just like I’d let them make subs, get everyone set, and restart when ready.
Agree, if the ball is dead, or effectively dead, and no quick tap then why not, just like I’d let them make subs, get everyone set, and restart when ready.
Referee and CMO
Team Red have been awarded a penalty. A YC card has been off the field for 12 minute. (Due to continuation of play.) Assuming no quick penalty has been taken, team Red would like to bring on their YC. They want to:-
A.) Take a kick for touch. yes
B.) Take a shot at goal. yes
C.) Opt for a scrum. yes
D.) Tap and run with the ball. yes, but not quickly, if they go quickly then the YCed player waits for the next opportunity to come on, it's their prerogative
well I wouldn't rule it out, but I can't think of any situations where it's relevant.
and there is a downside.
- perhaps he is watching the oppo and deliberately trying to keep his options open - or trying to to deceive the oppo as to what he is about to do ? Me asking him to announce what he is going to do isn't fair
- or what I ask him, he says touch, the oppo and I all then relax, and he sees that and kicks it across the field to the winger to score ... then I have made a problem for myself, the oppo might naturally feel I have somehow gotchad them,
TBH - I don't really see any situation where I need to ask?
Last edited by crossref; 2 Weeks Ago at 17:04.
I dunno, but I think I would use my common sense/instinct and would trust the captain. Especially if it is indeed the 10.
and anyway - if it was the first few minutes of the game how likely is it that their best kicker started on the bench ?
The converse is much more likely : the undisputed kicker is taken out, replacement wants to kick. Would anyone really refuse permission ?
Last edited by crossref; 2 Weeks Ago at 18:04.
I must admit I’d be reluctant unless I knew for certain it was permissible. Very critical decision. I don’t think a ref at my usual level would allow it unless he/she was certain. As things stand with my knowledge of the situation I can only refer to the regulations. That is a definitive that the ref can show any coach in writing.
Apart from perhaps one person from the southern hemisphere it looks as if we have a considerable amount of consensus and that referees would allow a YC to return at a penalty if the non-offending side want to make the return. I must admit I am slightly disappointed by the number of responses because it was a genuine question to try to gauge what degree of consistency we have.
Now can we look at a similar situation where we have the non-offending side wanting to make a replacement.
Team Red have been awarded a penalty and want to make a replacement. Assuming no quick penalty has been taken, team. They want to:-
A.) Take a kick for touch.
B.) Take a shot at goal. (Not by the replacement in RFU land because it is not allowed.)
C.) Opt for a scrum.
D.) Tap and run with the ball.
What would you do or expect the referee to do? Anything different to the YC return?
Last edited by Balones; 2 Weeks Ago at 19:04.
For me it's the same: I would let them make a replacement (and then , of course , so can blue)
again I wouldn't be asking them what they are going to do (can't see the point seeing as they are entitled to change their mind anyway) but I would warn them before they made the replacement, that the replacement can't kick for goal
Last edited by crossref; 1 Week Ago at 07:04.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)