Page 1 of 14 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 132

Thread: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

      
  1. #1

    Referees in Australia
    SimonSmith's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Central Australian Rugby Referees
    Grade
    B3
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    8,787

    Default Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Two incidents for me. One blindingly obvious, the other confusing.

    Jordie Barrett (who, with his brother, account for 33% of AB red cards) sent off for doing a Hastings. Went up to collect a high ball, extended his leg, with the end results of studs in face of Koroibete.
    Offski. The commentators eventually agreed, and used it as vindication of the 20 minute red.

    The other one confused me a bit. Unfortunately I don't have video or a time stamp but:
    AB chasing Australian player.
    Effects tackle around the legs.
    Both go to ground.
    Tackle is completed.
    Australian player tries to get to his feet.
    AB doesn't release.
    AB penalized for failing to release and (the audio wasn't clear) not letting Aus get back to his feet.

    I had a "whut?" moment, and still do.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.
    Marcus Aurelius

    Man may do as he will; he may not will what he wills
    Arthur Schopenhauer

    Tullamore Dew, the Afghan Wigs, and many, many strippers - how to get over your ex. How true.

  2. #2

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,628

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Quote Originally Posted by SimonSmith View Post
    Two incidents for me. One blindingly obvious, the other confusing.

    Jordie Barrett (who, with his brother, account for 33% of AB red cards) sent off for doing a Hastings. Went up to collect a high ball, extended his leg, with the end results of studs in face of Koroibete.
    Offski. The commentators eventually agreed, and used it as vindication of the 20 minute red.
    Well, I'm going have disagree with you about the RC. Sorry

    Its all about balance... Black 15 is rotating backwards, if he doesn't do something to mitigate that rotation (and pretty much his only option is to stick a leg out) he risks flipping over and landing on his back/shoulder. If he keeps his leg back, or even worse, tucks it up, he will increase his rotation - that's plain ordinary laws of physics (called conservation of angular momentum). Ask any gymnast, or tumbler, or trampolinist, or high-diver how important your legs are to body rotation. Additionally, if he hadn't put his leg out, Korobete could have run into him while he was still in the air, and flipped him over.

    Now I don't blame the referee at all for this ludicrous state of affairs... I blame the fecking clueless morons at World Rugby - they encourage players to jump as high in the air as they can to compete for the ball, then they further encourage them by giving them mandatory protection in the laws - "Protect the man in the air at all costs", until a player in the air has to protect himself, then all of a sudden, its the player in the air who's at fault.

    The clueless morons don't have the first fecking idea why things like this happen! Idiots one and all.

    Quote Originally Posted by SimonSmith View Post
    The other one confused me a bit. Unfortunately I don't have video or a time stamp but:
    AB chasing Australian player.
    Effects tackle around the legs.
    Both go to ground.
    Tackle is completed.
    Australian player tries to get to his feet.
    AB doesn't release.
    AB penalized for failing to release and (the audio wasn't clear) not letting Aus get back to his feet.

    I had a "whut?" moment, and still do.
    Yup, saw that. I think Retallick was the tackler - he had a "whut" moment too

    Ya gotta let him up! Amirite?

    Oh, wait.


    [RANT]
    I've reached to almost the end of my patience with Rugby.... my more that 50 year love of the game has all but gone. Rugby has changed to the point where I hardly even recognise it as the same game. If you want to protect players from head high and neck high tackles, fine - make it illegal to tackle above the waist. If you want to prevent player in the air from being flipped over, fine - make it illegal for players to jump to catch a kicked ball.

    Right back to the yellow carding of Finn Russell for not having the vision and reaction time of Superman, through several other incomprehensible decisions to this one are, to me, symptoms of a game that has lost its way. World Rugby are killing the game, and they're too fecking stupid to realise it.
    "You can Google for information, but you can't Google for understanding"
    - Jay Windley

  3. #3

    Referees in Australia
    SimonSmith's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Central Australian Rugby Referees
    Grade
    B3
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    8,787

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Yeah, it was the Retallick incident. Glad to know I wasn't the only one!

    I didn;t comment on the validity of premise of how the game deals with players in the air...Simply that under the current guidelines, it was stonewall.

    I think I disagree with your analysis on a couple of things, based on this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JE8yjTAJdYM

    1. If he had left his kicking leg down, he wouldn't have been falling backwards. Flipping his leg up like onloy increases his rotation.
    2. Koroibete MAY have hit him, but it looked to me like he had put the brakes on and was going to hit him when he landed.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.
    Marcus Aurelius

    Man may do as he will; he may not will what he wills
    Arthur Schopenhauer

    Tullamore Dew, the Afghan Wigs, and many, many strippers - how to get over your ex. How true.

  4. #4

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,628

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    OK, I've just had a chance to watch again on Sky highlights.

    Barrett is definitely rotating backwards, and that rotation stops before his foot strikes Korobete's face, so he ends up falling straight down on his back. I disagree with your assertion that throwing a leg out like that increases rotation. It in fact does the opposite.

    Honestly, even if this wasn't the trial law, and instead the RC put them down to 14 for the rest of that match, the Wallabies were so woeful that it would not have made a difference to the result. However, having the RC player allowed to be replaced after 20 minutes highlights the problem World Rugby have created for themselves. They have reduced the level of foul play at which a player can be RC, and in so doing, have left more serious offences without a more serious punishment. It is ludicrous that an accident like this (even if you judge it to be reckless) gets the same punishment as a player eye-gouging an opponent, or biting him, or wilfully stamping on his head.

    The need for Law 9 to be revised is greater now that it has ever been. It should be split into three parts instead of two - Unfair Play for infringements that are technical in nature with no risk of injury to an opponent, Dangerous Play for infringements that occur in the normal course of play, where the infringer acts accidentally, negligently or recklessly (but not intentionally), and Intentional Foul Play for offences where the player intentionally strikes or assaults an opponent or an official. You should only be able to be sent off and not replaced at all for offences in the last category (black card?)
    "You can Google for information, but you can't Google for understanding"
    - Jay Windley

  5. #5

    Referees in England
    ctrainor's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Cumbria Referees Society
    Grade
    7
    Join Date
    23 Jun 05
    Posts
    2,555

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Let's be clear, Barrett, (and many others over the years) put himself in that position where he was recklessly out of control.
    He put his studs into an opponents face, red all day long. The ref was 100% correct.
    Would those who argue against the card change their mind if Korobete had lost an eye?
    Even if Barrett had missed his face, I would penalise for dangerous play.

    I played fullback back in the day albeit at a lower level and in different times, never jumped for a ball once. If fullbacks adopted this approach, 9 times out of 10 the jumping chaser is going to collide and land badly! just an opinion.
    Ciaran Trainor

  6. #6
    Rugby Club Member

    Soc/Assoc
    Yet to join
    Grade
    Select Grade
    Join Date
    08 Oct 11
    Posts
    237

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian_Cook View Post
    Now I don't blame the referee at all for this ludicrous state of affairs... I blame the fecking clueless morons at World Rugby - they encourage players to jump as high in the air as they can to compete for the ball, then they further encourage them by giving them mandatory protection in the laws - "Protect the man in the air at all costs", until a player in the air has to protect himself, then all of a sudden, its the player in the air who's at fault.

    The clueless morons don't have the first fecking idea why things like this happen! Idiots one and all.
    Yup,

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian_Cook View Post
    [RANT]
    I've reached to almost the end of my patience with Rugby.... my more that 50 year love of the game has all but gone. Rugby has changed to the point where I hardly even recognise it as the same game. If you want to protect players from head high and neck high tackles, fine - make it illegal to tackle above the waist. If you want to prevent player in the air from being flipped over, fine - make it illegal for players to jump to catch a kicked ball.

    Right back to the yellow carding of Finn Russell for not having the vision and reaction time of Superman, through several other incomprehensible decisions to this one are, to me, symptoms of a game that has lost its way. World Rugby are killing the game, and they're too fecking stupid to realise it.
    Yup

    Yup

    YUP

  7. #7

    Advises in England
    OB..'s Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Glos & District
    Grade
    Adviser (grass roots)
    Join Date
    07 Oct 04
    Posts
    22,885

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    If a player jumps in such a way that he has to stick out his foot to control rotation, that player has blundered, and done so in such a way as to be dangerous to an opponent.

    (Yes, I do know about rotation in diving - my daughter was an international.)
    He trudg’d along unknowing what he sought,
    And whistled as he went, for want of thought.
    The Referee by John Dryden

  8. #8

    Referees in New Zealand
    Ian_Cook's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Retired player and referee
    Grade
    Level 2
    Join Date
    12 Jul 05
    Posts
    13,628

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Quote Originally Posted by OB.. View Post
    If a player jumps in such a way that he has to stick out his foot to control rotation, that player has blundered, and done so in such a way as to be dangerous to an opponent.

    (Yes, I do know about rotation in diving - my daughter was an international.)
    OB, players are being encouraged to jump as high as they can, by being repeatedly told by the lawmakers and referees that if they don't jump higher than the other guy, they will automatically be ruled at fault, and will be red carded if the opponent lands on his head.

    I submit that when you ask players to do things that are beyond the margins of safety, YOU WILL get mistakes - it is unavoidable - the faster you go, the worse the crash; the higher you jump, the more likely you are to make a mistake of balance or timing, the more risk you take of suffering big fall.

    This business of protecting the player in the air has become an utter farce. If World Rugby are actually serious about preventing players getting injured, either outlaw jumping to claim possession of a kicked ball, or limit who is allowed to jump for it (either the kicking team or the receiving team), or adopt a variation of the basketball rule I have outlined previously, but don't encourage players to play beyond the margins of safety and then punish them for errors of judgement when they do.
    "You can Google for information, but you can't Google for understanding"
    - Jay Windley

  9. #9

    Resident Club Coach
    didds's Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    N/A
    Grade
    Club Coach
    Join Date
    27 Jan 04
    Posts
    10,493

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian_Cook View Post
    [RANT]
    I've reached to almost the end of my patience with Rugby.... my more that 50 year love of the game has all but gone. Rugby has changed to the point where I hardly even recognise it as the same game. .
    I sympathise and empathise Ian. I suspect though that if you watch your local club, especially your local U21s/colts you'll see a game that is closer to what you hanker for.

    I like watching elite level rugby - but I dont view as important any more really.

    didds

  10. #10

    Advises in England
    OB..'s Avatar

    Soc/Assoc
    Glos & District
    Grade
    Adviser (grass roots)
    Join Date
    07 Oct 04
    Posts
    22,885

    Default Re: Bledisloe 3 - the sacrifice of the...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian_Cook View Post
    OB, players are being encouraged to jump as high as they can, by being repeatedly told by the lawmakers and referees that if they don't jump higher than the other guy, they will automatically be ruled at fault, and will be red carded if the opponent lands on his head.
    That is not quite what I observe.
    He trudg’d along unknowing what he sought,
    And whistled as he went, for want of thought.
    The Referee by John Dryden

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •